![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Wait wait wait.
What about a rotation with bi-weekly repops that are fully open? Does that solve both of our problems? That's something I could get into, but still seriously unlikely that you'll get the playerbase behind it without someone pushing the envelope... Again, in a perfect world, maybe. But just not realistic I guess. | ||
|
Last edited by Aaryonar; 03-26-2013 at 10:27 PM..
|
|
||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Original Minyin
Original Tattersail | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
An idea that's been brought up before, that would level the playing field a little more and involves no rotations and no "free handouts" is limits to guild rosters. Smaller rosters means more guilds, means more options for raiding, means more competition if that's your thing.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
If you want competition, why would you possibly like variance, where players 'compete' to see who can leave their character at the login screen while they watch TV?
1) Enable PVP for raid encounters - there is some competition for you 2) Simultaneous repops, no variance, and antipoopsocking code - that is real racing 3) Forming the smallest guilds that can still handle a spot in the rotation, thus maximizing your pixels I think you are a reasonable guy Mav, don't you think you can find better ways to compete in EQ if that is your thing?
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|