![]() |
|
#91
|
|||
|
just get a Rain Caller for your ranger and everyone will love you
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#92
|
|||
|
Just ignore the hate. It's part of being a ranger. You don't want to group with those people anyways, they are dumbasses. At least they self-identify. When you do get in groups/duos, MAKE SURE YOU KNOW HOW TO PLAY. Moronic monks and stupid rogues are given a pass, but any mistake you make as a ranger will be taken as proof. Save a few clerics and enchanters. Park mobs. Harmony pull. Show what you can do. Know how aggro works. Peel with flame lick/snare/spam heals. etc. Most of all - don't whine, just do your best. You can expect to be shunned by some, so get used to it.
Look at it this way - any fool can play most classes to 60. When I see a 60 Ranger, I am seriously impressed. When I see a 60 knight, I am impressed. Most other classes - yawn. Rogue - lol.
__________________
The Ancient Ranger
Awake again. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#93
|
|||
|
All 60s pretty easy here. Dat chardok flow.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#96
|
|||
|
No self respecting Ranger would do that cheesy shiz anyways.
__________________
The Ancient Ranger
Awake again. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#97
|
||||
|
Quote:
People will still pay the flat 2k when they are with 2 SKs, 2 Bards, Wizard and themself...
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#98
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The only assholes are the ones that expect others to adhere to their view of how the game should be played. If I don't want to group with hybrids I don't have to. If you do that's fine you can do whatever you want but don't give me shit for not playing like you think I should. You won't catch me giving you shit for playing how you want to play. Who's the asshole here? | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#99
|
|||
|
My average group for Seb tends to go Cleric/(Sk,War,Pal)/Rogue/Shaman/Enchanter/Monk.
I've grouped with a few rangers, all whom were our pullers, but those were few and far between. Wasn't anything exceptional besides tracking and harmony, which was nice. When you have a camp you can easily rotate through, it throws them out of the picture, as I'd take something with more DPS. I'd never throw out one class for another but I personally wouldn't take a ranger over anything else that was available when forming. I'm not saying they are a terrible class but when it comes to killing speed, rangers are not a go-to choice. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#100
|
|||||
|
Quote:
And don't give me the "They're not mean, they just derive fun from efficiency!" bullshit. No. Everyone wants to be efficient. They probably won't leave the group for a better class to replace themselves for the sole purpose of it making the group more efficient. The derive fun from efficiency for their own self-interest, often at the expense of others given the scarcity and often unsoloable nature of the game. They'd rather see someone unable to play than sacrifice a tiny bit of experience, that's what makes them an asshole, but you can call that a "play style" if you'd like. Quote:
As a wizard, I've had this said to me several times before. | ||||
|
Last edited by sox7d; 11-03-2014 at 10:28 PM..
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|