End of the rotation?

[Ravager]

And TMO can't say shit about this. Years ago when TMO was rotating Trak with IB and VD, they argued the exact same thing.

[wycca]

Originally Posted by Juevento [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one in BDA ever liked the rotation, except for that pinko commie Chest.

The manner in which that shit got abused was mind boggling. You had people throwing away years old relationships to form a splinter guild to maximize pixels (Omni). You had TMO fire up an alt guild to get class R pixels (Asgard). You have the professional leach guilds Europa and A-Team team up with whoever was up for a mob they couldn't kill.

That shit was never going to last. You people and your pixel lust were the impetus for this.

There were only so many times you can poke the larger more capable guilds before we had to respond.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't get the big deal. The proposed changes were simply asking that guilds that ally to kill things to share the same rotation spot. FFS, even the GM's considered FE/IB as a single raiding entity and afforded them the same 2 trackers that TMO had.

So why not just keep it all the same, and force ppl who ally to stay allied for 30 days +/-

[Phantasm]

Play game->Have fun

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why not just keep it all the same, and force ppl who ally to stay allied for 30 days +/-

They smaller guilds wanted ZERO changes, just maintain the status quo.

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They smaller guilds wanted ZERO changes, just maintain the status quo.

And whats wrong with that? What happened to your altruistic bravado of "its to make the server a better place" etc? Im just confused on how you can take such a dramatic turn towards hypocrisy, although I can tell you it isn't unexpected.

[Raev]

Says the guy who deleted the FAP forum to hide the truth.

You came in with two conditions and assured us they were non negotiable. Then you came out with a second proposal that was even sillier than the first.

Also Ravager, you aren't reading that proposal very carefully.

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Says the guy who deleted the FAP forum to hide the truth.

You came in with two conditions and assured us they were non negotiable. Then you came out with a second proposal that was even sillier than the first.

Also Ravager, you aren't reading that proposal very carefully.

FAP forum is still there.

[arsenalpow]

Lol I deleted nothing. I have minions for that sort of thing.

[wycca]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't get the big deal. The proposed changes were simply asking that guilds that ally to kill things to share the same rotation spot. FFS, even the GM's considered FE/IB as a single raiding entity and afforded them the same 2 trackers that TMO had.

More propganda and white-washing.

The current rules already had joint sign-ups and a progression system. Plenty of guilds signed up when they struggled to kill mobs solo.

Blatant lying.

Proof (joint signups, guilds not signed up for every mob, progression required) -

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


PIXEL LUST