RMTers discuss P1999 dsetup.dll "includes some NSA-level intrusive scans on your PC"

[Alaron01]

Originally Posted by Ostros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can't stop laughing. Do you even read the links you post?

I have decided I will entertain a reasoned objection to what I just posted. I just can't help myself. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ostros]

Originally Posted by Alaron01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have decided I will entertain a reasoned objection to what I just posted. I just can't help myself. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And I've decided that I'm just going to point and laugh. Join in on the fun lads.

[Alaron01]

Originally Posted by Ostros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And I've decided that I'm just going to point and laugh. Join in on the fun lads.

I figured you'd have nothing. Ok, bye now [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ostros]

Originally Posted by Alaron01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I figured you'd have nothing. Ok, bye now [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right. I don't. You did it for me. You just can't fucking read. I can't respond to literally nothing new from your view point.

Get out.

[Alaron01]

lol

Originally Posted by Ostros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right. I don't. You did it for me. You just can't fucking read.

I posted reading materials that clearly back up what I was saying and you accuse me of not reading?

Originally Posted by Ostros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can't respond to literally nothing new from your view point.

What does that even mean?

Originally Posted by Ostros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Get out.

I'm trying, but you're too cute.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Secrets [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's trivial to reverse for the advanced x86 asm-knowing programmer. nothing is stopping you from getting phant0m + ollydump and figuring out the same thing. unless you can't, then you can just stick with the tinfoil hat on.

This is complete bullshit right here. He may look good in a wig, but time to put the brakes on the Secrets smokeshow I think. Too many people getting smoked up and choking in this thread.

Even someone familiar with ASM would be missing little intricacies and intended functions of the program and what its capabilities are. lol who the fuck is going to disassemble a .dll anyway? That's ridiculous. You won't find a single sperg who is willing to do this because there will still be incomplete guesses and theories to fill in the limitations of "decompiling" (lol) a .dll file. You would still end up theorizing even if you were decent at making sense of ASM. Its a fucking .dll, its not going to be decompiled..

A good faith offer would be to allow a 3rd party programmer in good standing, with his place of employment provided to Rogean, (for assurance and security clearance) to examine the source code and give a statement on its scope and power.



And of course I don't believe Rogean, nilbog, Sirken or any high level P99 staff would misuse any data, even if the .dll were sucking up everyones financials. Those are all stand-up guys.

It is the temp volunteers of P99 people should be most concerned about having access to any type of data collection device. It is the employees of the NSA people are concerned about. The contractors, the senior guides, the here-today-gone-tomorrow GM's, and yes, even your beloved Secrets. :P

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Alaron01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's assume that you are a young child who wants to verify that humanity has indeed traveled to the moon. When you ask your father he could do one of two things,

1) Offer some documentation of the journey to the moon. It could be a book with pictures or a TV documentary. Something like that.
2) He could tell you that you must make the journey yourself and find the footsteps left by the original astronauts.

Telling normal people to decompile DLLs is similar to option 2. I'm saying that although you may possess the technical chops to do so, you should be remain empathetic with those who don't. It's an asinine thing to say.

Its a troll. You can't "decompile" a .dll file. Period.

Even your precious RedGuides is just speculating and making baseless accusations after "decompiling" (LOL) and attempting to make sense of a "decompiled" .dll.

Good smoke though, completely derailed constructive discussion.

[simp403]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even someone familiar with ASM would be missing little intricacies and intended functions of the program and what its capabilities are. lol who the fuck is going to disassemble a .dll anyway? That's ridiculous. You won't find a single sperg who is willing to do this because there will still be incomplete guesses and theories to fill in the limitations of "decompiling" (lol) a .dll file. You would still end up theorizing even if you were decent at making sense of ASM.

There are plenty of people who live and breath assembly code. For example, anyone who does decent penetration testing will be able to read assembly. Furthermore, there are no "intricacies and intended functions" that would be missed if someone had their hands on the actual bytecode, which can be obtained using an x86 debugger like Secrets said. Anyone with a decent level of proficiency with asm can translate the bytecode directly to assemble. It's just a matter of translating the assembly into a specific high level language, but nothing would be missing from the actual assembly code.

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its a fucking .dll, its not going to be decompiled..

This took me less than two minute to find.

Please just stop talking. It's obvious to anyone with actual technical knowledge that you're talking out of your ass.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by simp403 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are plenty of people who live and breath assembly code.

Please just stop talking. It's obvious to anyone with actual technical knowledge that you're talking out of your ass.

ASM reverse-engineering won't be done to a .dll, and certainly not this one.

Why? Because no one can or will do it.

Provide actual evidence rmtsite reverse-engineered the .dll a single member of the P99 community can do anything with ASM or shut up.

It would have been done by no for something "serious" like this. Don't you think? Who is the ass now? How possible is it again? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Alaron01]

Originally Posted by simp403 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are plenty of people who live and breath assembly code. For example, anyone who does decent penetration testing will be able to read assembly. Furthermore, there are no "intricacies and intended functions" that would be missed if someone had their hands on the actual bytecode, which can be obtained using an x86 debugger like Secrets said. Anyone with a decent level of proficiency with asm can translate the bytecode directly to assemble. It's just a matter of translating the assembly into a specific high level language, but nothing would be missing from the actual assembly code.



This took me less than two minute to find.

Please just stop talking. It's obvious to anyone with actual technical knowledge that you're talking out of your ass.

I agree with you. But I still think there is a good chance Secrets is talking out their ass.