Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:20 PM
Salty Salty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
.

Let's not forget that when the Tranquil Staff on this server dropped, Breaking (transcendence) was in a full Fusion group and we awarded it to him NBG without rolling. For every bad example that comes out on these forums, there are many examples of good and sportsmanlike companionship among members and groups on p99 involving Fusion.
How is this even brought into the discussion?

Do you seriously have to glorify a moment about a group giving a monk item to a monk?

fuckinglol
  #92  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:21 PM
Molitoth Molitoth is offline
Sarnak

Molitoth's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let's not generalize that all Fusion/DA/Dozekar members are scumbag/idiots/greedy. I'm sure there were many circumstances that lead up to what happened in this group today. I'm sure both parties involved were guilty in some aspect, and in retrospect, I'm sure both people involved would probably have handled it differently if given the chance.

Let's not forget that when the Tranquil Staff on this server dropped, Breaking (transcendence) was in a full Fusion group and we awarded it to him NBG without rolling. For every bad example that comes out on these forums, there are many examples of good and sportsmanlike companionship among members and groups on p99 involving Fusion.
This.
  #93  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:22 PM
Salty Salty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,126
Default

breaking a pimp too
  #94  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:24 PM
Dagner Dagner is offline
Kobold

Dagner's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How is this even brought into the discussion?

Do you seriously have to glorify a moment about a group giving a monk item to a monk?

fuckinglol
I was simply pointing out, by using an example, that making vast generalizations about Fusion's members based on one incident doesn't mean it is the common way that all their members conduct business.
  #95  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:24 PM
casdegere casdegere is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let's say I'm on my enchanter in a random Crypt group and a JBB drops. Do I automatically get this because my main is a shaman? I need it! No, sorry. It goes to whomever rolls the highest. Often "need" is arguable too. So unless otherwise stated and unanimously agreed upon, it's /random 100 for everybody.
No, your Shaman was not in the group. I don't understand the difficulty to understanding NBG. If there is a Shaman in the group and a JBB drops, the Shaman shows what he has or just says he is in need OR he passes because he has something nice or has a JBB. A pass constitutes a full group Random. As an Enchanter I would never roll on a item if I know it is good item for another class and they are in need of it. If a "caster" item drops and there is more than one caster, these casters would random the item or both pass to a full group random. I have found that most people, if this is discussed early on, are pleased with the idea of NBG. There is no arguement or hard feelings and people are genuinely happy to see others get good stuffs. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
"Death is certain, life is not."-Unknown
"When in doubt, burn it to the ground!"-Me
  #96  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:25 PM
Salty Salty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I was simply pointing out, by using an example, that making vast generalizations about Fusion's members based on one incident doesn't mean it is the common way that all their members conduct business.
But the risk is higher
  #97  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:26 PM
Salty Salty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,126
Default

=) =) =) =) =) =) =) =)
  #98  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:30 PM
Massive Marc Massive Marc is offline
Fire Giant

Massive Marc's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kanada EH ?
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I was simply pointing out, by using an example, that making vast generalizations about Fusion's members based on one incident doesn't mean it is the common way that all their members conduct business.
They aren't basing their generalization based on one incident...
  #99  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:31 PM
Walk Walk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: alaska
Posts: 22
Default

actions speak louder than words
  #100  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:38 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Lesson:
When grouping with certain people, get a screenshot of them explaining the loot rules. Get a screenshot of you rolling.

As it is, there is too much reasonable doubt right now as to what happened, even though we all know what really went down.

Keep it classy.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.