![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don’t recall specific threats here on P99. I DO recall a past kid posting online that he planned to be a “professional schools shooter”, it getting reported to the FBI, and the FBI basically ignoring it. That was a specific threat, didn’t appear to be a joke, didn’t appear to mean in a video game. And yet the FBI did nothing. I don’t think that’s how it should be handled. Obviously we can’t throw the kid in jail forever, but when threats like that are made, some sort of parent contact and monitoring should be put in place Oftentimes, that’s the only warning we are ever going to get | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Biden nearly ended the drone war
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
of course maybe they didn't report it because this is a bishop to rook move, and the empire is allowing the caliphate room to grow. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ✝ | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#5
|
||||||
|
Well this just reminds me that after we defeat the demonrats that the republicants are going to try to blame outside influence for everything strip me of my rights too instead of just accepting that in a world of freedom there is a pain.
Entropy creates suffering which invented happiness. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
its 1000000000% video games cause violence. Like, have any of you actualy been a kid before? didnt you go to that one kids house that killed animals? and you were like WTF? well I went to that kids house like 50 times in 50 different states, they. are. everywhere. Just get over it. We dont need to regulate video games and the internet and put parrental advisory stickers (because thats what they thought caused all the shootigns int he 80s! music!!!) It's blame one outside influence after the other with pearl clutchers. dont be one! | |||||
|
Last edited by Jibartik; 12-04-2021 at 01:48 PM..
|
|
|||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
This might be controversial with conservatives, but I don’t see why since we have no problem with felons losing gun rights…
…that if you post a bunch of direct threats online, you should be flagged in the FBI system in regards to gun purchasing. I’m not saying not able to buy a gun ever, maybe just a mandatory waiting period of 3 months. A waiting period might do nothing at all, but if just one crazy person with a short attention span loses interest and abandons the plan after a month, then it just saved lives Obviously whoever analyzes these threats would need to be very focused on context. Some people might just suck at making a joke. Some people shouldn’t be comedians but try anyway. It might require looking through some past communication to get a better idea of context. Context is everything Edit: when I’m dealing with analyzing threats in my job, the context (what was the communication and behaviors immediately prior to the threat) is one of the first questions I have | ||
|
Last edited by unsunghero; 12-04-2021 at 01:34 PM..
|
|
||
|
#7
|
||||
|
because that's a registry to imprison dissentienters.
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by Jibartik; 12-04-2021 at 01:46 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
If I buy a gun, and I dont want it anymore, and I give it to someone, and they use it to rob a bank, it's not my fault.
If it was my fault then the future will be: When I think about looking at a gun online a goverment agency is going to be alerted and my name will go onto a flagged list where all of my other internet posts will be reviewed by an AI system to determine threat levels if any of the threats I have made online are too nuanced for the type of person Horza is to not understand then I will be considered a danger to society and my social credit will go down and my interest rates will go up. All because I looked at a picture of a gun because I wanted to see what it looked like. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
The other problem too, is who is investigating these threats?? A police officer in uniform coming to a kid’s home and saying “did you post online that you wanted to shoot your classmates?!” is a terrible fucking setup. Police uniforms with all the gear on them are designed to intimidate, I have no problem with that concept. But the combination of intimidating uniform/gear + blunt accusatory question, of fucking course the kid is going to deny it
But send a social worker who begins with building rapport and validating the kid, and all of a sudden you have a whole different interview. “Bullying is so hard to escape these days, it can happen both at school and online now, has this been happening to you? How much has it impacted your life? What are some of the things you think you can do to make it stop?” A kid is still going to have to be fairly dumb to confess to a social worker that they are harboring thoughts of killing others, but let’s face it MOST past school shooters have been fairly dumb kids. And they are more likely to admit it in the second scenario than the first | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|