![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I haven't been as lazy as Lethdar. You can start reading from this page on for much fun. There's like 10 pages of it
http://www.fohguild.org/forums/mmorp...x-emu-103.html | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
i played a ranger to 40 something back in classic (live). It was a lot of fun actually, I was dual wielding. All the fun utility spells that I wanted, at 39 you get sow too, which is finally nice to no longer beg for.
Never played a paladin, can't comment. They seem fun though.
__________________
Lizarus - 16 necro
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Also the devs you quoted don't confirm the % that the people refer to when asking questions, simply the concept.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Rangers suck unless you get mistwalker, dragon haste and plane of sky bow
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Paladin or bust
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
i should of ninja'd that cloak
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Rangers are okay and nicely self-sufficient, but they don't do any particular thing well enough to shine in any given role. This goes for both PvE and PvP. Whatever your crew is trying to do, a ranger adds less towards that goal than one or more other classes could. If you just run around picking 1v1 fights, ranger is alright. The fights that mean something rarely have any need for a ranger, because they tend to take place in dungeons where rogues and monks are better, or they're large group battles where the ranger's utility isn't needed because most classes are there and can do it better. Rangers only shine with Graym's apparent playstyle: running around selectively picking 1v1 fights on his terms against sub-par players.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|