So this is actually a big deal.

[Lexical]

ITT: HBB thinks anarchists are not a specific group.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

u dum as fuq

lulz

What percentage of Americans would you say identify themselves as anarchists?

[Lexical]

kinda does.

[Lexical]

Answer the question first.

[Lexical]

Would you say that anarchists have a very clear attribute that sets them apart from non-anarchists?

[Lexical]

So it is more of a political philosophy you are saying than a party?

[Lexical]

This makes it different than banning the person from seeing anyone who affiliates with the republican party right?

[Lexical]

but you didn't say conservative, you said republican party and now you are saying anarchism is not a political party [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lexical]

I guess by completely changing your stance is a way to avoid a trap card, but that still doesn't matter. Anarchism has very clear ideologies that set it apart from other things making anarchists a specific group who thus you would agree with is okay to bar from seeing. Not only that, but given the very small population of anarchist groups(which the court barred the man-child from seeing) it ruling becomes even more specific. You are only using hyperbole to make your point seem relevant, but in the grand scheme of things, it isn't.

[Lexical]

it explains why you are wrong which is a trivial matter so yes nothing in the grand scheme of things.