Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 09-08-2010, 12:38 AM
ShnarfShnarf ShnarfShnarf is offline
Decaying Skeleton

ShnarfShnarf's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
might have been what trans done to get the loot off the mob, but from looks of it they didnt get the mob
Might have been what da did to get the mob, or didnt get the mob.

being huge douchebags, as per the guildcharter, not only did they try to leapfrog but had to resort to KSing when they failed

Real Grade A stuff from da here
  #102  
Old 09-08-2010, 12:39 AM
whitebandit whitebandit is offline
Fire Giant

whitebandit's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Arizona Bitches
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The master Raid Policy Thread can be found

Here.
Q: Can we continue to camp the raid mobs?
A:
"Camping" of raid targets has completely changed. If you choose to lay a claim to an unspawned raid npc, your raid must be at the npc's spawn point with sufficient force. (within aggro range of the npc when it spawns, with at least a 15 member raid party). e.g. (inside Nagafen's Lair) This is the ONLY way claims of unspawned raid targets will be respected.]
What about that part? ONLY in my opinion means ONLY.. this whole situation makes me realize a few things about this server that is for sure.
__________________
Kite (60- Preserver)
Lizard (60- Grandmaster)

Lich (56+ Heretic)
Zelda (45 Shaman)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael View Post
silence, 'hardcore scum'
  #103  
Old 09-08-2010, 12:54 AM
Ronas Ronas is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShnarfShnarf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
being huge douchebags
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #104  
Old 09-08-2010, 12:56 AM
a_forum_troll_001 a_forum_troll_001 is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitebandit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What about that part? ONLY in my opinion means ONLY.. this whole situation makes me realize a few things about this server that is for sure.
only if you complain enough, or blatantly admit you were up there waiting just in case, clearly NOT sitting on the spawn as the rules to clearly and utterly state.

can we just change it to FFA and turn this into a "who's got more friends" battle? or preferably a fix that makes 46+ players pvp flagged? cant cry when you're already dead!
  #105  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:12 AM
Glitterati Glitterati is offline
Kobold

Glitterati's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 112
Default

What part of Rogean's ruling don't you idiots understand? He threw out the camping rule and reverted to the First to Agro rule, and Slydexx was first to agro. It's all right there in his logs.
__________________
dun dun dun daaaaa Bitch Pudding

Glitterati Irons - Wood Elf Druid.
  #106  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:30 AM
a_forum_troll_001 a_forum_troll_001 is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitterati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What part of Rogean's ruling don't you idiots understand? He threw out the camping rule and reverted to the First to Agro rule, and Slydexx was first to agro. It's all right there in his logs.
i could care less either way, bold is my point. whats the use in making a big deal over rules, when they're cast aside on a regular basis? it might as well be changed to FFA, let us tear each other apart, and less headaches for the gm's.
  #107  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:41 AM
Dukat Dukat is offline
Orc

Dukat's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a_forum_troll_001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i could care less either way, bold is my point. whats the use in making a big deal over rules, when they're cast aside on a regular basis? it might as well be changed to FFA, let us tear each other apart, and less headaches for the gm's.
You've wiped the cum out of your eyes and seen the light. Grats
  #108  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:41 AM
Glitterati Glitterati is offline
Kobold

Glitterati's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 112
Default

Ever heard of case by case basis? The point is, GM's have the final word over everything that happens here.
__________________
dun dun dun daaaaa Bitch Pudding

Glitterati Irons - Wood Elf Druid.
  #109  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:43 AM
sidgb sidgb is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitterati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What part of Rogean's ruling don't you idiots understand? He threw out the camping rule and reverted to the First to Agro rule, and Slydexx was first to agro. It's all right there in his logs.
Actually, without Rogeans logs showing aggro was lost, it would have appeared DA was first to engage at the time because of the DT on Amothiel. In true FTE without GM logs, Trans would have been obligated to back off in favor of DA.

But yea, DA should have left you guys alone. Best to stick to the, "we were camping in the general vacinity if Inny's spawn a safe distance away first and rely on the play nice policy" arguement. It's the best.
__________________
Straxx - Enchanter
Eminence - Cleric

EMINENCE
  #110  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:46 AM
Ingrum Ingrum is offline
Sarnak

Ingrum's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Planes
Posts: 244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a_forum_troll_001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i could care less either way, bold is my point. whats the use in making a big deal over rules, when they're cast aside on a regular basis? it might as well be changed to FFA, let us tear each other apart, and less headaches for the gm's.
It might as well be changed to respecting other players and acting like civilized human beings. Kind of like that fair competition idea that discourages distasteful tactics. Less headaches for the GMs.

And once again, Rogean resorted to the FTE rule when there wasn't a clear alternative.

Please, if you don't like how they run their server then feel free to go make and manage your own. But you won't. BECAUSE YOU LOVE IT.
__________________

Ingrum Irontoe
Retired Warlord of Brell
"Yeah, I'm kind of a big deal..."
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.