#101
|
|||
|
Here's a question for everyone else, those who want the roll to work - if this has to be player enforced, is there an enforcement mechanism that won't violate server rules?
For example, can we adopt broadly agreed upon sanctions among the top guilds (who as far as I can tell were all on board) against the players who disregard the roll (do not group, do not buy from/ sell to) or even against guilds who refuse to drop said players and/or help them with the encounter after their ill-gotten turn in? Or would such political agreements amongst players and guilds violate a server rule? | ||
|
#102
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#103
|
|||
|
scout lawmaking is a great argument for the red server
| ||
|
#104
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Too bad. Buy them. Maybe if people hadn't been ragey, inconsolable pricks about it, there could have been some kind of compromise. The people who win the turn in are fine people and you all trashed them for it. You deserve nothing. Quote:
| ||||
|
#105
|
|||
|
everyone just be cool and do the roll like the 8th ring, it was alot nicer going out there and having an actual chance at the scout. YAY FOR THE ROLL!
| ||
|
#106
|
||||
|
Quote:
The CLASSIC PnP meant you could not monopolize a spawn, its the only reason there were lists in classic. If the PNP hadn't existed (as I've proved it did) the servers would have been as toxic as this is when it comes to rare spawns. A few ignorant people will argue that "PnP was never enforced" or "I played for 55 hundred years and don't remember PNP", it was, your memory sucks, theres a threadnaught in bugs which I started suggesting that there was Lazy Aggro in Kunark and Velious, its a threadnaught because it was filled with people with vested interests trying to lie, pretend, or ignorantly claiming LA didn't exist, it did and while it took 3 or more years to convince people it was added. PNP is the same, it was an essential part of the classic experience. | |||
Last edited by Ikon; 08-21-2017 at 05:55 AM..
|
|
#107
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#108
|
||||
|
Quote:
To be fair, it did really feel like the server was coming together when we all showed up, had our fair shot at a winning roll, quickly dispatched the Kromzek Captain, and congratulated each other on getting some nice items. The fact that it was never promised but players acted honorably and allowed the roll to persist was really heart warming. | |||
|
#109
|
|||
|
If the whole server is driven by "classic" ideology then out only makes sense to have some pnp in effect. Were lines respected by gms back in the day? I can't recall but i do know there was an enforced pnp.
__________________
Unli, Magician of the 50nd Teleport
"if the rules are all you use to determine what you should or shouldn't do, you're probably an a-hole" -soup Hooden • Xegony enchanter '00 - '02 • <Aeternus> from SoD '06 - '07 | ||
|
#110
|
||||
|
Quote:
The official line basically went "sort it out or accept our decision which you both probably won't like" and "no mob / camp can be monopolized, if you're arguing over a spawn then we'll force you to take turns at PH". Also it was prohibited to kill and get an item , corpse it and keep camping if someone was waiting. You could not give a camp to your friend / alt if someone was waiting. | |||
|
|
|