Do not allow gnoll fangs to drop if killed by a level 18 and above

[lecompte]

Originally Posted by daasgoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

a silly goose.

Anyone else hear that with a Mr. Slave accent?

[daasgoot]

Originally Posted by lecompte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone else hear that with a Mr. Slave accent?

*Raises Hand

[loramin]

Originally Posted by daasgoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Say it is broken and giving too much exp.. why try to get it nerfed? lvl 1-20 sucks. You are a silly goose.

Because this is a classic server. You might want the easiest server possible, and if so great: go play on EZ Server and have fun. The rest of us (and certainly all of the developers) want a server that emulates Classic Everquest as well as possible, and if that means making things harder we're all for it.

[Pinolian]

Originally Posted by daasgoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Say it is broken and giving too much exp.. why try to get it nerfed? lvl 1-20 sucks. You are a silly goose.

I dont want the exp nerfed. I have never said that.

I want level 18+ people who turn them in to get shit for exp so that they go the fuck away from the zone.

Actually what I suggested was that the fang not drop for level 18+ people. But that is probably a more complicated change.

Shaving exp at the turn in for folks who the zone is green for solves the problem, and fangs can be turned in for faction still, so faction hits are retained.

[Quineloe]

There's an extensive guide on the forum about researching the history of classic EQ and digging through the very deepest section of the intarwebs. If you can find posts from 2000 stating exactly how many pixels of a bubble the gnoll trade in filled, you might be on to something.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Quineloe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's an extensive guide on the forum about researching the history of classic EQ

You wouldn't happen to have a link handy? I tried a bit of searching and couldn't find what you're talking about.

Personally I kind of think such a post should be stickied; might avoid a lot of posts in threads like this one.

[triad]

this is very similar to the us gov.. "we are unhappy with the actions of a few make more rule/laws because control makes me feel safe" ... fucking man up and go to a different camp.. it sucks but its way better then extra unnecessary rules because one person doesn't like that they cant get what they want

[Quineloe]

Finding the already stickied thread on "How do I research" on your own is basically the first test on whether you should devote any time to this.

[Yonkec]

Originally Posted by Quineloe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Finding the already stickied thread on "How do I research" on your own is basically the first test on whether you should devote any time to this.

Often in life one must admit defeat before they have even begun.

[loramin]

Thanks for that completely unhelpful response. Have you actually tried searching for that phrase here?

Search: Keyword(s): research
The following words are either very common, too long, or too short and were not included in your search: how, do, I

Surprise surprise, when you search for "research" alone, you get a whole lot of unhelpful results.

And yes, it is stickied in the bug thread but obviously there are a lot of people who could potentialy help the project that don't venture far from this main forum. Let's make it as hard as possible for them to contribute!

For everyone else's benefit the thread (that I still think should be stickied here in the main forum) is:
http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5570