![]() |
|
#101
|
||||
|
Quote:
We will show up to CT and play with the big boys on CT at 4am est or whatever this week was because THAT is some fun competition right there. Good clean fun where no one gets hurt and I got no problem losing to the faster aoe team and the better raid force. But training Kael or ToV with mobs and wiping literally all life in a pursuit for my personal pixels is not how i see the raid rules. To us, that's an exclusive format at best and an environment built on raid infractions at worst. Let's not distract ourselves with conversation of ability. It has no part in this discussion. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#102
|
|||||
|
Just a small update.
For the voice chat I'm leaning towards discord, please have that installed on your computer if you are planning to attend. You can download it for free here: https://discordapp.com/download Regarding Variance; we have no plans, intentions, or desire to adjust the current Variance. It use to be a much larger window, and currently we feel it's in a nice middle ground between what Variance use to be and not having Variance at all. So love it or hate it, it's not worth discussing in this thread. Regarding Earthquakes/Sim Repops: Literally everyone agrees that 3-5 repops a month would be ideal and work wonders across the board for everyone. I've never seen a player say more repops would be a bad idea. so again this topic is not worth discussing in this thread. You pals should focus on problems within the raid scene. Things like training, griefing, rules that no longer apply and need to be changed, how to change those rules, revamping the concession system in a 3+ guild system, other ways incidents can be worked out between guilds when its more than just two guilds, how to avoid petitioning every encounter, and things within that realm, etc. Those are the types of things you should all be discussing here, with a focus on ToV and Kael (as those seem to be the biggest problem zones). Another thing ive been hearing and getting messages about is who all will be here for this meeting. I'm looking for guild leaders of actual raiding guilds. The reason for this is that while i'd love to invite literally every guild leader on the server, the fact of the matter is that we've already seen in the past that things get increasingly harder with every extra person you add. I simply do not feel it's necessary to include everyone just so no one feels left out, or not special. you are all very special unique snowflakes. i just firmly believe it would be best to limit attendance to the Guild Leaders of the guilds that are currently dealing with the shit storm, as they are the ones most familiar with the issues and would have the best insight on those issues. i hope this helped clear some things up, and i am very much looking forward to talking with you all tomorrow. <3 Sirken
__________________
Ever wonder what Braknar does around here? - https://youtu.be/WTtFXBgggpI
Sirken's Twitch Stream - www.twitch.tv/sirken_ Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#103
|
|||
|
Damn that is soul crushing but also extremely helpful. Two of the biggest issues currently due to kunark era rules are the rules around a stall and a kite. They need to be looked at very closely which is probably going to be a difficult conversation since only 2 of the guilds have a significant deal of experience with the intricacies of stalling and kiting as it relates to tov and Kael = \
__________________
Pint
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#104
|
|||
|
Pint, I can see how you'd come to that conclusion. But you cannot read my mind so I object to you mapping that onto me. This probably isn't the right place for this, but maybe it is. Because our perspective counts, too, when it comes to discussing the rules. What follows is a portion of a post that I made to our guild forums on 8 Feb 2016 called: PSA - a word on target selection and being Omni:
I’ve heard there are some questions about why we select the targets that we do.This was met with broad approval by my guildmates. And within CSG, too. And that IS the reason that KT is off the table for us for now (except on repops). But Pint, your reply speaks volumes regarding the raid scene on the server. The very fact that you cannot imagine someone doing something out of principle, thereby needing to map another (baser) motivation onto it is very telling. But you've got NO business trying to divine intentions. You're dead wrong on this one.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#105
|
||||
|
Quote:
--I realize its not a topic for tomorrows summit, but can you push Rogean to give you the capability or automate sim repops, as it would make your (and every raid guild on this server's) life far easier. As Chest stated earlier, any other rule changes will simply be bandaids onto a festering wound. We can surely talk about revamping some rules to be brought up to date, but that will not reduce the number of petitions, trains, or the concession scene much at all. Those are all issues that arise out of too many top-end guilds and not enough content being up simultaneously forcing them to spread out.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Daldaen; 04-02-2016 at 01:24 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#106
|
||||
|
Div/Anon should send a singular rep, as should CSG. I don't need to hear a position 3 separate times from CSG nor do I want to hear all 3 of you agreeing with each other after every point you make.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#107
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#108
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Everyone else gets one rep, so should your raiding entity. I don't want an echo.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#109
|
|||
|
We are individual guilds who make individual decisions. Just like you didn't get to dictate who was a guild in Class R, you don't get to dictate it now. Be less worried about echoes and more worried about what to discuss tomorrow.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#110
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|