Dos the Left Hate Pride?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See your example falls through in your own paragraph. You complain about them forcing you to share the bathroom with a transgender. Yet... if you wanted less government the bathroom would just be "Bathroom" common use for anyone. Allowing transgenders to choose their bathroom is actually closer to liberty than gender assigned bathrooms. smh

Not at all. That's about as moronic as the lefts interpretation of freedom of speech or freedom of religion as to being "freedom from" and all their declared public safe places they squat in like dogs.

So, social Marxist, eh? Fk your Marxism, there are plenty of other countries you can move to if you really like that stuff. To remove moral laws and common decency is harmful, not just emotionally but even physically. I reject it on principle. The only way you can get that enacted into law is to have your BIG GOV force it on everyone since few to no cities or states where people actually vote will allow it. Just like California voted down same sex marriage, but a judge over ruled the vote. I trust the vote of the majority over the few SJW's out there forcing this dictatorship on us all. The left cries for "democracy" until it becomes inconvenient to them... which is most of the time.

The left really has your mind twisted with their Marxism, man. I don't think the book 1984 was meant to be so prophetic, but wow so many craving for it now, it's hard to ignore.

And no I'm not libertarian. They are not the only ones that have such views on liberty and a strong belief in the constitution (hint: think of a party that starts with C and that's the one I've been in over 25yrs) ... though the LP took a huge step to the left with their current candidate which made me sad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


late edit, hadn't read following posts yet

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think at least the three of us agree on this. I think the issue though is denying others the right to decline. There should be no laws prohibiting or compelling restroom usage. Private establishments should be free to implement restrooms as they see fit and public institutions should cater to both or neither. Thoughts?

See above. Also keep in mind the context of what he was quoting. I put it in the realm of state and/or local government decision, which is usually done by the voters. I'm not speaking of a huge federal law mandating morality as dems and the left strive for. It's all Orwellian imo.

You know, just like with San Francisco. It was actually legal to walk around the city in public, totally nekid. Only fat old homosexuals actually did, but it was legal. That was the will of the people... well until they got so disgusted with feces being left behind on seats and benches. So the voters said carry a cloth or napkin whatever and put it down then sit. The old fat gays didn't like that and refused to. So the voters made it illegal to be nude in public in their city. That's the system actually working! Leaving feces around like that is harmful. Even SF gets it!

And lets face it, when a dem/lib wants a law, it's a law on everyone else, but not on them. Word.
edit done

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not at all. That's about as moronic as the lefts interpretation of freedom of speech or freedom of religion as to being "freedom from" and all their declared public safe places they squat in like dogs.

Show me where the left translates freedom of religion or speech as freedom from? Can you support anything you say? Like at all? Serious questions.

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, social Marxist, eh? Fk your Marxism, there are plenty of other countries you can move to if you really like that stuff. To remove moral laws and common decency is harmful, not just emotionally but even physically. I reject it on principle. The only way you can get that enacted into law is to have your BIG GOV force it on everyone since few to no cities or states where people actually vote will allow it. Just like California voted down same sex marriage, but a judge over ruled the vote. I trust the vote of the majority over the few SJW's out there forcing this dictatorship on us all. The left cries for "democracy" until it becomes inconvenient to them... which is most of the time.

Please demonstrate social marxism. Also where is the morality here? Where does morality come from? Is morality standard? You assume a lot and can't seem to prove anything.

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The left really has your mind twisted with their Marxism, man. I don't think the book 1984 was meant to be so prophetic, but wow so many craving for it now, it's hard to ignore.

Please explain how anything I said was related to Marxism. This should be hilarious. I'll be waiting.

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And no I'm not libertarian. They are not the only ones that have such views on liberty and a strong belief in the constitution (hint: think of a party that starts with C and that's the one I've been in over 25yrs) ... though the LP took a huge step to the left with their current candidate which made me sad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Arguing with you is like arguing with a child. Your mind is too simple to understand the concepts in play. Libertarian is more than a political party... is existed long before the party. Stop trying to cram everything into to parties.... Fuck you're brainwashed.. it's evident in how you can't separate your thinking from the programmed politics of the US.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know, just like with San Francisco. It was actually legal to walk around the city in public, totally nekid. Only fat old homosexuals actually did, but it was legal. That was the will of the people... well until they got so disgusted with feces being left behind on seats and benches. So the voters said carry a cloth or napkin whatever and put it down then sit. The old fat gays didn't like that and refused to. So the voters made it illegal to be nude in public in their city. That's the system actually working! Leaving feces around like that is harmful.

the napkin law should have been ruled unconstitutional as it specifically targetted gay men(a group well known for their loose anii).

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please explain how anything I said was related to Marxism. This should be hilarious. I'll be waiting.

The bathroom issue stems from social/cultural Marxism, duh? You SJW Marxists want to force totalitarian rule through such battles, over time. Then again, you may be just too dumb to realize [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ...rather than just playing dumb hmmmm.. but that is part of their goal for control.
You don't even know what brainwashing is, bud. I'm sure you never bothered to follow any of my Bernays links. They have you hook, line and sinker, by definition of their own writings on how to do it, of which your liberal politicians praise the writings of. You pretty much put out textbook propaganda by result of your indoctrination.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The bathroom issue stems from social/cultural Marxism, duh? You SJW Marxists want to force totalitarian rule through such battles, over time. Then again, you may be just too dumb to realize [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ...rather than just playing dumb hmmmm.. but that is part of their goal for control.
You don't even know what brainwashing is, bud. I'm sure you never bothered to follow any of my Bernays links. They have you hook, line and sinker, by definition of their own writings on how to do it, of which your liberal politicians praise the writings of. You pretty much put out textbook propaganda by result of your indoctrination.

So again. You keep saying things.. you keep demonstrating you are unable to prove anything. Please demonstrate the Marxism in effect. Can you? Saying something is marxist doesn't make it marxist.. even if you wish really really hard.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

late edit, hadn't read following posts yet
See above. Also keep in mind the context of what he was quoting. I put it in the realm of state and/or local government decision, which is usually done by the voters. I'm not speaking of a huge federal law mandating morality as dems and the left strive for. It's all Orwellian imo.

You know, just like with San Francisco. It was actually legal to walk around the city in public, totally nekid. Only fat old homosexuals actually did, but it was legal. That was the will of the people... well until they got so disgusted with feces being left behind on seats and benches. So the voters said carry a cloth or napkin whatever and put it down then sit. The old fat gays didn't like that and refused to. So the voters made it illegal to be nude in public in their city. That's the system actually working! Leaving feces around like that is harmful. Even SF gets it!

And lets face it, when a dem/lib wants a law, it's a law on everyone else, but not on them. Word.
edit done

Yeah, poo is no good and I favor local law over state law over federal law because it is people governing themselves as they see fit. However, private establishments should be less restricted than public ones. For example, if the old fat gays in your example wanted to open a au naturale coffee shop rife with shit stained seats, they should be free to do that so long as they are not disrupting public space by flaunting their unattractive figures in Windows or something.

That is my point on bathrooms. If Chic-Fil-A decides it is a traditional establishment and define bathroom usage one way, they should be free to do that. And Dairy Queen should be free to do it differently if they choose to. If we don't like the policies of one or the other, we don't have to go there.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So again. You keep saying things.. you keep demonstrating you are unable to prove anything. Please demonstrate the Marxism in effect. Can you? Saying something is marxist doesn't make it marxist.. even if you wish really really hard.

https://youtu.be/ZIO4oSLwK3A

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://youtu.be/ZIO4oSLwK3A

So cultural Marxism is instigating conflict by making people think they are oppressed? That makes sense in the context of modern US leftism. That is precisely what I dislike about leftist ideology. I am not sure I have seen Alarti on the victimhood bandwagon so much though.

I would be curious to see a follow up from him and you on my bathroom questions though^^

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://youtu.be/ZIO4oSLwK3A

And then he was killed.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So cultural Marxism is instigating conflict by making people think they are oppressed? That makes sense in the context of modern US leftism. That is precisely what I dislike about leftist ideology. I am not sure I have seen Alarti on the victimhood bandwagon so much though.

I would be curious to see a follow up from him and you on my bathroom questions though^^

Here is my opinion of bathrooms. I don't give a shit.. well I might be giving a shit in the bathroom... I don't care who is in there.

As far as gender goes... the science says that gender is in the brain. Personal identity is in the brain. Just like how who I am exists in my brain... and if I lost a penis in 'Nam I'd still be male.


As for cultural marxism... rofl. Conspiracy theory popularized recently by the tea party dudes

Guess we got you figured out Daywolf. You're just a little neo-nazi aren't you.


The message is numbingly simplistic: all the ills of modern American culture, from feminism, affirmative action, sexual liberation and gay rights to the decay of traditional education and even environmentalism are ultimately attributable to the insidious influence of the members of the Institute for Social Research who came to America in the 1930's."[72]

"Dr. Heidi Beirich likewise claims the concept is used to demonize "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."

"According to Chip Berlet, who specializes in the study of extreme right-wing movements, the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory found fertile ground within the Tea Party movement of 2009, with contributions published in the American Thinker and WorldNetDaily highlighted by some Tea Party websites"