Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:08 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beentheredonethat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was never enforced on live, so I'd imagine it isn't that simple.
Agreed. This issue has been pounded on relentlessly. Either Rogean thinks his GMs can ride the line, derive intent, and somehow manage to not piss off anyone in a highly volatile community full of egomaniacs with every decision made to avoid the en masse accusations of GM corruption(Which this has been attempted several times by VZ/TZ staff, and never once succeeded)...

Or, does as was done in EQ Live, and lets the community handle it w/o GM intervention.

Hard decision!
  #102  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:14 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

You seem pretty mad bro. Were you one of those savage wolves that finally killed talendor right before the server was wiped? No wonder you're so angsty.

But please do repeat how you were part of top pve and pvp guilds etc over and over. If you repeat it enough maybe someone will believe you. In all honesty, there's no shame in being a part of some dark elf only roleplay guild on tz and savage wolves on vztz, no need to repeat your mantra trying to get people to take your retarded ideas seriously.

Just don't be a retard.
  #103  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:16 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

I'm sure you just don't want to reveal your characters as I've stomped you up and down on previous emu servers. No need to be timid bro.

ps - Actually the training situation was handled quite well on vztz when there was staff to enforce it. You can contrast this quite well with times when there were no rules w/r/t training and the effect on the server those periods had.
Last edited by lethdar; 08-24-2011 at 01:19 PM..
  #104  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:19 PM
Bardalicious Bardalicious is offline
Planar Protector

Bardalicious's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,684
Default

*unreal tournament voice*


TRIPPPPLEEE post!!!
  #105  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:21 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
*unreal tournament voice*


TRIPPPPLEEE post!!!
wat
  #106  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:34 PM
beentheredonethat beentheredonethat is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ps - Actually the training situation was handled quite well on vztz when there was staff to enforce it. You can contrast this quite well with times when there were no rules w/r/t training and the effect on the server those periods had.
I've played on pvp servers. They never really handled these situations well. For most part it was self enforced, an honor system, and it failed horribly most of the time. Be it intentional or not.

If you have to have a ton of GM's babysitting it just ends up costing a lot of time and money. Best way to avoid this is to either let it be, or change server code so that it simply wouldn't be possible most of the time. It is a very dated game, the game dynamics do not lead very well into such code change which is probably why Sony simply ignored the issue most of the time instead of changing it.
  #107  
Old 08-24-2011, 01:44 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

When you get into situations where people lose months of time invested (their character, permanently) for training it becomes a different situation. Rogean / Uthgard have access to logs that determine who agroed a mob first, second, and so on. This backed up with fraps (and if your guild cant find at least one person ready to fraps then your guild deserves to be trained to death), and an occasional GM monitoring a situation is plenty enough to result in the rule being enforced.

Do you think people will continue to train after their pal is permabanned? Will you run those firegiants into naggys lair knowing that this is the one raid mob spawning today and that there may be a GM watching you waiting to off your ass? Or even if a GM isn't present the combination of seeing you agro tranix and 6 firegiants first in the logs before the trained guild gain agro in combination of a fraps?

This isn't like vztz where you could level an alt to 46 in a day and train fear, and even then the problem was solved once sirken started banning all characters associated with that IP (sup knox lolo). Unless you're a grade A moron chances are you're not going to keep training once you see the first few bitch threads from people who grinded for a month+ to hit 50 and lost their account over a torbin's eyepatch.
  #108  
Old 08-24-2011, 02:12 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Best stance openly stated should be "we'll do the best we can about it". Over time, people who train will continue to do so and be banned.

This brings up the case of intentional XP lossing someone. Rooting them naked and training mobs etc. Intentional xp loss? Anyone?
  #109  
Old 08-24-2011, 02:51 PM
beentheredonethat beentheredonethat is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Best stance openly stated should be "we'll do the best we can about it". Over time, people who train will continue to do so and be banned.

This brings up the case of intentional XP lossing someone. Rooting them naked and training mobs etc. Intentional xp loss? Anyone?
i hated that on pvp servers too. Just had to deal with it, some of it was intentional, some was simply me being a dumbass running into mobs that some monk was trying to run away from and FDing.

I guess I do agree with the point that they basically have to let it happen. It's too much to enforce it, just way too many scenarios.
  #110  
Old 08-24-2011, 03:10 PM
Xantille Xantille is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sure you just don't want to reveal your characters as I've stomped you up and down on previous emu servers. No need to be timid bro.

ps - Actually the training situation was handled quite well on vztz when there was staff to enforce it. You can contrast this quite well with times when there were no rules w/r/t training and the effect on the server those periods had.
el oh el

Envious is the anonymous box + tallon zek superstar, bro. His identity must be protected.



and yes, I agree there needs to be some rule against training. It's pretty clear what effect a 'no rules' ruleset had on previous boxes, i.e. destroying the population
__________________
Xantille Cares
I fuk ur mouth since 2001
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.