Bring target rings back.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Jigga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hints at what else can be more Nilby?

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...6&postcount=55

If you guys know more, post them up. We'll fix if we can.

[Atmas]

I remember as a wizard on live playing PvP I hated these rings ferociously.


As a guy playing on a PvE server atm and often doing trades in EC I miss them.

[miethos]

I remember when they went live, first thing I tried to do was figure out how the hell to turn them off. Don't need no stinkin rings around stuff.

[Malrubius]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...6&postcount=55

If you guys know more, post them up. We'll fix if we can.

Not sure if it's possible or not, and I know I'll be flamed for it, but I'd love it if casters had to stare at their spellbooks until level 35 again.

That might have gone away pre-Velious anyway though, in which case it wouldn't be worth it.

Keep up the good fight. It looks like we're evolving closer to 100% classic with every patch.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Malrubius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure if it's possible or not, and I know I'll be flamed for it, but I'd love it if casters had to stare at their spellbooks until level 35 again.

That might have gone away pre-Velious anyway though, in which case it wouldn't be worth it.

Keep up the good fight. It looks like we're evolving closer to 100% classic with every patch.

Book meditation wasn't removed until 2002.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...0&postcount=36

[Ennoia]

Only bad players need target rings.

[Hottbiscuits Dreadmuffin]

Duxa's all in one installer thing got rid of the target rings for me when I did it a few months back.

I prefer it this way.. the rings reminded me too much of the "newer" EverQuest.

[mala]

Ive got one, that may or may not be different on purpose.

Pet damage if the pets holding a weapon should be different. If im not mistaken the damage on a weapon had a drastic effect on the damage output of the pet, while it does not here. Is this supposed to be that way or just hasnt been changed yet?

[RiffDaemon]

Originally Posted by Doors [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Speaking of which, I'm curious to know why you'd remove target rings but you left item linking in.

I keep hearing this 'not classic' argument but it seems like you pick and choose what you want to be classic.

Rogean, Uthgaard and Co. have said long ago that code constraints and other obstacles prevent them from removing Titanium-era features, and if they ever find a way to get around said obstacles, they will remove those features with prejudice.

So when they finally find a way to remove Item Linking, they're gonna do it.

[Fuzzi]

Allow two boxing and make them pay for both accounts.