Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Is variance still needed?
Yes, it promotes "competition" 75 29.18%
No, its an unneccesary non-classic time sink 182 70.82%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2009, 07:22 PM
Reiyz Reiyz is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 20
Default

If you have a variance on the spawn of EVERY RAID BOSS, and you limit the rules that a guild can only physically camp and be able to claim one mob upon it's spawn, then everything is gravy.

People are still going to camp; but they can't camp everything and while they're sitting there camping the precious spawn of nagafen, Fear could pop allowing some other guild to jump in there while Group A is still all "WHERE IS MY NAGGY."

Thus leading to a highly inefficient guild, unable to ACTUALLY mobilize when it counts.
  #2  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:12 AM
darkkor darkkor is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

darkkor's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiyz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you have a variance on the spawn of EVERY RAID BOSS, and you limit the rules that a guild can only physically camp and be able to claim one mob upon it's spawn, then everything is gravy.
Exactly, especially the bold part.

On my server it was first guild to get there ONCE THE TARGET POPS gets the first crack. This is hands down the best way to handle racing to spawns. You still get to compete over the spawns and use scouts to tell when something pops but you can't sit there 15 hours before a mob spawns with your entire raid and say 'camped', the guild can only mobilize once it's actually up.

So much better than trying to whack it first then have a possible KS situation (sometimes only allegedly) which was happening weeks ago from what I hear and was a big reason for the many GM interventions which can be avoided as long as you use a system that doesn't require "tapping" the mob. This system does that but still keeps the power in the players hands.
  #3  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:15 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkkor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the guild can only mobilize once it's actually up
Who is going to police this?
__________________
  #4  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:50 AM
darkkor darkkor is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

darkkor's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Who is going to police this?
Well, the guilds themselves agree to the rule, and of course any breaking of the rule gets taken up with GMs. The only part that needs to be "policed" really is making sure there isn't X amount of Y guild in the zone before the mob spawns. That could be handled easily I think. (X to be agreed upon, preferably no more than 1 group)

This rule keeps the competition-racing-to-a-spawn without 2 guilds arguing over who tagged it first and then who KS'ed the other.

You can still have it come down to whoever engages first instead of whoever gets there first, as long as the guild mobilized only after the mob spawned. You can go either way with it. I would think it's rare that both the guilds would get there ready to pull at the exact same time if they both left after their scouts tell them "Vox is up!"

I see it like this. Say you have a running race. Start the 2 runners off at the finish line, and you'll have many arguments over who finished first once the gun goes off. You would need technology (slow motion camera lol) to determine it.

Now, start the runners off at the beginning of the race down the street and most likely they will get there at 2 different times and the winner will be more clear cut more often.

Make sense? Sound feasible?

I really only see it working like this, the way it was with all the fighting weeks ago, or the way it is now with a mandatory rotation. I've seen some other gimicky ideas that sound cool, but this really keeps it classic and minimizes tag arguments and KS allegations.

PS - A little bit of time variance couldn't hurt too much either. Make each spawn vary by about 6 hours and then tack on the above rule, THEN you would REALLY have a spontaneous guild race to engage first and it would be extremely rare that any 2 guilds are perfectly ready to pull at the exact same time as another. Once the engage happens the other guild must back out and continue to mobilize / buff behind them.
Last edited by darkkor; 12-19-2009 at 06:59 AM..
  #5  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:25 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkkor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, the guilds themselves agree to the rule, and of course any breaking of the rule gets taken up with GMs.
Certain players have shown that they cannot follow agreements which are not set in stone and impossible to find a loophole around. GM's have stated that they will not be involved.
__________________
  #6  
Old 12-19-2009, 03:57 PM
Widan Widan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkkor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Exactly, especially the bold part.
On my server it was first guild to get there ONCE THE TARGET POPS gets the first crack. This is hands down the best way to handle racing to spawns. You still get to compete over the spawns and use scouts to tell when something pops but you can't sit there 15 hours before a mob spawns with your entire raid and say 'camped', the guild can only mobilize once it's actually up.
No, you should be able to sit in the zone for as long as you want before the mob spawns if you so choose. This is everquest, time gets rewarded. What this solves is being able to sit in every raid zone with a capable force, which won't be possible.
  #7  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:13 AM
Andman Andman is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Hey there,

I am in neither guild, but I posted an idea that I consider to be worth a look.

Page 8 of this post:

http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=1489

It is a variation of the idea presented by Hasbinbad
  #8  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:00 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey there,

I am in neither guild, but I posted an idea that I consider to be worth a look.

Page 8 of this post:

http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=1489

It is a variation of the idea presented by Hasbinbad
You just linked my post :P
I can't believe that not only do you try to hijack my post, but you advertise the hijack in another thread.
You're full of win.
Here dude, take this.
__________________
  #9  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:03 AM
Andman Andman is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
Default

eh?
  #10  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:09 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
eh?
This or the topic. Don't start whole new conversations in the middle of other peoples topics.
It doesn't really matter here, this topic is "mostly dead" I think.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.