Quote:
Originally Posted by aussenseiter
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How can that be true if total deaths decreased post-jab?
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
So if there's a confirmed 10,000% increase in a previously rarely heard of heart condition after the jab (some instances non fatal) .... total deaths which includes only deaths but also from other causes offsets this.... somehow?
I'll try to explain it to you very simply again.
A previously rarely heard of complication has cases through the roof post jab.
No one should be getting boosters or taking ivermectin, or otherwise. You're much safer with the ineffective "horse paste" (ivermectin is sold for humans in pill form, not just horse paste lol) option, rather than the ineffective jab option.
For the casual observer, considering the stage of the game we are at right now, you can see there is absolutely no point trying to have a serious debate with these kinds of people. They have to be defeated, no compromise.