the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[starkind]

It's also biased towards greater population densities. Florida and California are already among the most populous states.

Though if you think the grass is greener in FL u r kinda dumb. We just have different problems. Plenty of meth and STDs if you're into that kinda thing, plus flesh eating bacteria.

I think this graph just shows the flow of old people retirement mainly. I also don't doubt LA and other parts of California are slums or just straight up uninhabitable. You should see downtown Tampa, at pete tho. Or.. try to go to the ER in and around New Port Richey.. or the Orlando suburbsol.. Jesus. God bless you all.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

bro you keep throwin up this strawman that nobody is askin for like it's an argument

try harder

it's the implication of your boneheaded idea, trogman.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's the implication of your boneheaded idea, trogman.

only in your mind dude

as stated before, 230 is a privilege. not a right.

[Ooloo]

*elevator music as horza mulls the question over and again decides not to answer it, in the hope that nobody will ever bring it up again*

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as stated before, 230 is a privilege. not a right.

For some reason I lack confidence in you guys' understanding of privileges and rights.

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's a privilege to be able to vote, not a right.

[Gatordash]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's also biased towards greater population densities. Florida and California are already among the most populous states.

Though if you think the grass is greener in FL u r kinda dumb. We just have different problems. Plenty of meth and STDs if you're into that kinda thing, plus flesh eating bacteria.

I think this graph just shows the flow of old people retirement mainly. I also don't doubt LA and other parts of California are slums or just straight up uninhabitable. You should see downtown Tampa, at pete tho. Or.. try to go to the ER in and around New Port Richey.. or the Orlando suburbsol.. Jesus. God bless you all.

Yes that chart is showing numbers only, not per capita. But this is the first year that California has ever lost population, so its not retirement.

Top 5 states by percent decline
1. Wash DC
2. New York
3. Illinois
4. Hawaii
5. California

Here is the government census release: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres...estimates.html

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Gatordash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes that chart is showing numbers only, not per capita. But this is the first year that California has ever lost population, so its not retirement.

Top 5 states by percent decline
1. Wash DC
2. New York
3. Illinois
4. Hawaii
5. California

Here is the government census release: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres...estimates.html

I imagine from the media coverage the looting that's gone on (in Cali) which has shut down a lot of Walgreens etc isn't good for migration in.

Sad to see.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For some reason I lack confidence in you guys' understanding of privileges and rights.

nah man

it's only your own ignorance of the subject that's the problem

you like to pretend, but you a total low iq phony. if your ideas weren't benefiting from something that was written in 1996 way before social media censors started abusing it's original intent, you wouldn't be makin a fool out of yourself like you are right now. if the righties abused it in the same way, i'd be makin the same point that 230 needs to be revised to the internet world we live in now.

they tryin to fit everythin into a box that was constructed in 1996 when only 5% of the total world population was online. it's archaic and much of the language needs to be clarified to adjust to fit with how much more control of speech and reach a monopoly of a few internet companies have on the market today

allow the free market of political ideas. commies have totally raped this idea and are startin to stamp labels on political speech they don't agree with to censor it cuz they intellectual cowards. take the let's go brandon dad. msnbc is sayin 'let's go brandon' is insurrectionist rhetoric. they usin labels to censor speech cuz that's what commie scumbags do. they can't compete within a free market of ideas, so they demand compliance instead.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nah man

it's only your own ignorance of the subject that's the problem

you like to pretend, but you a total low iq phony. if your ideas weren't benefiting from something that was written in 1996 way before social media censors started abusing it's original intent, you wouldn't be makin a fool out of yourself like you are right now. if the righties abused it in the same way, i'd be makin the same point that 230 needs to be revised to the internet world we live in now.

they tryin to fit everythin into a box that was constructed in 1996 when only 5% of the total world population was online. it's archaic and much of the language needs to be clarified to adjust to fit with how much more control of speech and reach a monopoly of a few internet companies have on the market today

allow the free market of political ideas. commies have totally raped this idea and are startin to stamp labels on political speech they don't agree with to censor it cuz they intellectual cowards. take the let's go brandon dad. msnbc is sayin 'let's go brandon' is insurrectionist rhetoric. they usin labels to censor speech cuz that's what commie scumbags do. they can't compete within a free market of ideas, so they demand compliance instead.

Do you disavow?

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes gravy, you just made the argument for "private company", yup.

Twitter is violating the law by making editorial decisions while still enjoying the protections of 230. That is literally the entire basis of the dispute surrounding section 230 protections with regard to nascent social media technology and it's implications for society.

This is how dumb Baler and Elizondo are they don’t even realize how much more Twitter helps GOP to get there fakenews out to their hate folk.

Contrary to popular belief, Twitter's algorithm amplifies conservatives, not liberals: study
Conservatives have long accused social media platforms of discriminating against them, but the opposite is true


.