Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[cd288]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What evidence have you provided to show an Enchanter pet out DPSing a Warrior from levels 12-30, for example?

I am only insulting people who insulted me first lol. You can read the post history. You aren't looking very good here[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well the simplest point is that you showed one parse. This is a random number generator game. So sure you could have a warrior out DPS occasionally. You showed one parse of a warrior barely out DPSing the charmed pet. Go do it like 1,000 times and see how many times that happens.

As other commenters noted, you also failed to supply a multitude of relevant information (probably because it would be used to disprove your point). For example, the specific gear the warrior has on, the warrior's stats, the buffs the warrior has on (if any), as well as failing to provide the level/AC/class of both enemy mobs and the level/class of the charmed pet along with whether it had any gear equipped or whether it had any buffs.

Knowing you and your obsession with being right all the time I wouldn't be surprised if you slowed the mob before charming it lmao. Maybe you should provide all that info and then do a video of you out DPSing the charmed pet 100 times in a row.

At any rate if you want further evidence go google it. Charmed pet DPS has been proven for two decades to generally be better than player DPS unless in certain instances where the player is well geared and well buffed compared to the level of content they're doing.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well the simplest point is that you showed one parse. This is a random number generator game. So sure you could have a warrior out DPS occasionally. You showed one parse of a warrior barely out DPSing the charmed pet. Go do it like 1,000 times and see how many times that happens.

As other commenters noted, you also failed to supply a multitude of relevant information (probably because it would be used to disprove your point). For example, the specific gear the warrior has on, the warrior's stats, the buffs the warrior has on (if any), as well as failing to provide the level/AC/class of both enemy mobs and the level/class of the charmed pet along with whether it had any gear equipped or whether it had any buffs.

Knowing you and your obsession with being right all the time I wouldn't be surprised if you slowed the mob before charming it lmao. Maybe you should provide all that info and then do a video of you out DPSing the charmed pet 100 times in a row.

At any rate if you want further evidence go google it. Charmed pet DPS has been proven for two decades to generally be better than player DPS unless in certain instances where the player is well geared and well buffed compared to the level of content they're doing.

You showed zero parses. So how is your information better? Please provide this googled information. It should be easy to get if it's there[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PlsNoBan]

Every time you post is evidence of autism which I point out. You just don't like the evidence so you dismiss it.

Warriors solo better than enchanters LOL

Can't stop laughing

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Keebz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nice gaslighting. You wasted 100 pages arguing nonsense about your cherry-picked logs and "math". Now if you want to talk about the original topic, you have to actually make an argument for shaman. They don't win by default. Sorry bud.

DSM switches arguments faster than Trump does about the Mar-a-Lago raid

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

can't provide an actual argument, or evidence.

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM switches arguments faster than Trump does about the Mar-a-Lago raid

Not really. I am debating like 8 people at a time. They are all wrong, and can't even individually stay on topic. They have to keep switching arguments to try and prove they are right. Post history is quite clear[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cd288]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You showed zero parses. So how is your information better? Please provide this googled information. It should be easy to get if it's there[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you for proving my point. When someone raises issues with your "evidence" you just ignore their points.

Are you willing to provide all that info and then stream 100 kills on your warrior out DPSing the charmed pet? Waiting for the stream!

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Post history is quite clear[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you for proving my point. When someone raises issues with your "evidence" you just ignore their points.

Are you willing to provide all that info and then stream 100 kills on your warrior out DPSing the charmed pet? Waiting for the stream!

I didn't ignore the points at all. You just say "google it", and assume that's it.

Here, I'll do it too. "Google it". Now we are equal. Except I have parses and you don't.

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.






How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Do you think he's eventually going to respond if you post the same thing enough?