If you believe in god, you're an idiot...

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you mean god of the gaps? That doesn't apply. His wording is a little awkward in that he attempts to vaguely quantify the likelihood of our being the most intelligent beings, but the basic argument that all available evidence points to us being the most intelligent beings is both sound and valid.

Unless you've had a visit from aliens you'd like to share with us..?

Eh i was at work I didnt really feel like writing a full blow theory with source material. Its RnF afterall

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, there's probability of life in the universe seems high, even if life requires conditions to life we already know of, but the distance to all of this life is so far and getting further with that expanding universe :P

With further development of quantum theory and fun abstracts like quantum entanglement distance might prove to be a minor factor for the discovery of life. Which ties into the theory that if there is more advanced intelligence(life or not) that it would have discovered us or made itself known by now. No not but abducting us and anally probing us(maybe hasbinbad).

If the purpose of life is to create greater intelligence, which is what I think, then a greater intelligence would have no benefit of discovering us without making itself known and advancing us.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With further development of quantum theory and fun abstracts like quantum entanglement distance might prove to be a minor factor for the discovery of life. Which ties into the theory that if there is more advanced intelligence(life or not) that it would have discovered us or made itself known by now. No not but abducting us and anally probing us(maybe hasbinbad).

I think you are getting a little too excited over the quantum entanglement theory. It doesn't imply teleportation at all. It really just suggests instant data transmission theoretically, but you would still have to have to travel the parsecs.

Worm holes on the other hand are an entirely different matter which could lead to faster than light travel. There was some crazy engineer who released some ridiculous blue prints that manipulate gravitational fluxs in their fields which would theoretically cause faster than light speeds by tearing a whole in space/time.

Anywho, the point of this post: Stop abusing the quantum entanglement theory >: (

[Lexical]

When I say faster than light travel, I mean in terms of displacement not velocity.

[Dirtnap]

Granted we are the most intelligent beings we know of, we just can't honestly say we are the most intelligent beings in the universe. We won't be able to say that until we have seen it all.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think you are getting a little too excited over the quantum entanglement theory. It doesn't imply teleportation at all. It really just suggests instant data transmission theoretically, but you would still have to have to travel the parsecs.

Worm holes on the other hand are an entirely different matter which could lead to faster than light travel. There was some crazy engineer who released some ridiculous blue prints that manipulate gravitational fluxs in their fields which would theoretically cause faster than light speeds by tearing a whole in space/time.

Anywho, the point of this post: Stop abusing the quantum entanglement theory >: (

..... Data is what exactly?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Dirtnap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Granted we are the most intelligent beings we know of, we just can't honestly say we are the most intelligent beings in the universe. We won't be able to say that until we have seen it all.

Did anyone say that. I said there is a high chance we are the most intelligent beings in existence.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

..... Data is what exactly?

values of qualitative or quantitative variables encoded in some format for transmission.

[Hasbinlulz]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why? Because you belief differently?

No, because you have the gall to speculate on the likelihood of that about which you have zero evidence.

You can say what you believe, but you stated "there is a good chance of [blah blah being a valid state of events]" and that is ridiculous and you should be ashamed.

[Hasbinlulz]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hypothesize differently !

a conclusion is different than a hypothesis, and you should look up hypothesis.