Chira numbuh wan!

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread gonna go on longer than the shaman / enc duo in The Priest Forums

Shaman suck with ENC as a duo partner compared to Paladin / Cleric btw

Yea obv there’s too much overlap in the slows and buffs with shm/enc. I’d say Druid pairs better due to at least offering snare for safer charms

But nothing beats enc/clr. I actually only did this duo one time with this dude from forums who had a max’ed out 60 of almost every class. And we wrecked through Chardok for a while

[Reiwa]

Trump appointee is no longer an active anti-semite

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you fail to pick up on the main point, but that's ok you are not a native english speaker

the United States Agency for International Development (USAID, not food for poor foreign kids) is one of dozens of US governments organizations funneling tax dollars to activist agencies

Politico is one among hundreds

You are not a citizen, the only reason for you to play the games that you do is that you seek to promote anti-american narratives

It doesn’t really matter exactly what the money goes towards. It could have been to international right wing propaganda

The real issue is these are bureaucrats, not elected officials, and they have an absolutely terrible track record on transparency, and cooperation

Which is why Marco Rubio put them on blast recently. He said they outright refuse to respond to policy directives and just do their own thing. In what world other than gov’t can a company get away with this? Any private company who’s employees just decided to do whatever they wanted would have been fired long ago

A prime example is when Doge first announced the inquiry, didn’t USAID initially respond with directives to do basically everything short of breaking the law to block it? That’s what the news I read about it said. That already looks shady

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It doesn’t really matter exactly what the money goes towards. It could have been to international right wing propaganda

The real issue is these are bureaucrats, not elected officials, and they have an absolutely terrible track record on transparency, and cooperation

Which is why Marco Rubio put them on blast recently. He said they outright refuse to respond to policy directives and just do their own thing. In what world other than gov’t can a company get away with this? Any private company who’s employees just decided to do whatever they wanted would have been fired long ago

A prime example is when Doge first announced the inquiry, didn’t USAID initially respond with directives to do basically everything short of breaking the law to block it? That’s what the news I read about it said. That already looks shady

yeah it makes me wonder who the federal govt actually works for

it sure as hell isnt the people

it doesn't seem like they even work for themselves, otherwise at least something would get done whether we like it or not

the entire effort of the US gov't seems to function to prevent anything from actually happening, one way or the other, just maintenance of status quo

but who's status quo is it?

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gonna be a viral outbreak in Africa thanks to the USAID shutdown

If we are starting from the assumption that the millions and millions we’ve sent has been mismanaged

And the assumption we can’t enforce what another country’s leaders do with our money we give them

Then the way to get change with that country (or any entity) is to cut them off. It’s just like a relationship. You have a spouse who is toxic in some way, you try pleading, you try plying, you try everything to make them change but you can’t control them. So you say “fine I’m leaving” and then, and only then, SOMETIMES, after a while they say “ok if you come back I really will change”

And then only sometimes they mean it. But it can be a way to get net positive change when everything else fails

[shovelquest]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://x.com/CubanOnlyTrump/status/1887315025808724317

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we are starting from the assumption that the millions and millions we’ve sent has been mismanaged

And the assumption we can’t enforce what another country’s leaders do with our money we give them

Then the way to get change with that country (or any entity) is to cut them off. It’s just like a relationship. You have a spouse who is toxic in some way, you try pleading, you try plying, you try everything to make them change but you can’t control them. So you say “fine I’m leaving” and then, and only then, SOMETIMES, after a while they say “ok if you come back I really will change”

And then only sometimes they mean it. But it can be a way to get net positive change when everything else fails

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is absurd, and yet not at all surprising

there is nobody on earth more corrupt than a clinton

I shudder to imagine where we would be if she won 2016

[shovelquest]

no one is above the law

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It doesn’t really matter exactly what the money goes towards. It could have been to international right wing propaganda

The real issue is these are bureaucrats, not elected officials, and they have an absolutely terrible track record on transparency, and cooperation

Which is why Marco Rubio put them on blast recently. He said they outright refuse to respond to policy directives and just do their own thing. In what world other than gov’t can a company get away with this? Any private company who’s employees just decided to do whatever they wanted would have been fired long ago

A prime example is when Doge first announced the inquiry, didn’t USAID initially respond with directives to do basically everything short of breaking the law to block it? That’s what the news I read about it said. That already looks shady

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=

I think if congress created the agency and its legal mandates they don't have to listen to Lil Marco.