![]() |
#111
|
|||
|
![]() Lol I doubt any of you neck beards are even capable of assault, except for if they forget your extra nacho cheese at T-Bell.
| ||
|
#112
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#114
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#115
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
#116
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#117
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
#118
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
the fact that he was carrying a weapon does not in any way impact his rights before or during the confrontation. he was within his rights to follow martin, armed or not. he was within his rights to ask what he was doing, armed or not. and upon being assaulted, per his statements, he was within his rights to use deadly force once he was being physically harmed and feared for his life the fact that he had a weapon is mostly irrelevant up until he actually fired it. it doesn't alter anyone's responsibilities or rights | |||
|
#119
|
||||||
|
![]() Quote:
This trial is not about policy, it's about determining his liability under the law (in theory, at least). Under Florida law and the current evidence on record with the court, he is in no way the legal instigator of the crime, and even if he was, self-defense is still on the table as a valid legal defense. Let's assume that even IF Zimmerman walked up and threw the first punch, the moment he expressed a clear desire to withdraw, he regained the right to use self-defense, which in this case, likely included the use of deadly force within the right of self-defense. In most cases, screaming for help on the ground fits that bill. Fights can be thought of like a boxing match or a jousting tilt. Every single "fight" happens in clashes and stutters. The moment you have a certain level of separation (to be determined by the facts) a "new" fight starts. Yes, you can run up to a guy, punch him, and then say "wait wait I don't want to fight I'm leaving," and if he hits you back, he is also guilty of battery. It's an oversimplification, but the point is the same. Even if Zimmerman was looking for a fight, the law and the record supports an acquittal. Escalation is also a "new" fight. If someone slaps you and you pull a knife, you are the aggressor. Quote:
It might seem counter-intuitive, to some, that you can't make some kind of stand, but the underlying policy is that you get back at someone by suing them or having them arrested for their crime. Your remedy lies elsewhere. Self-help and force is ONLY allowed to the extent reasonably necessary to prevent harm imminent to you. The record and the law both support Zimmerman's story. The prosecution seems to be failing at meeting its burden. No one's really trying to pat Sheriff George on the back for what happened, but one must acknowledge the legal realities. No amount of indignation will change what happened. A lot of people are using this case as an opportunity to discuss what they feel are shortcomings within the legal system. That's fine, but when you refuse to acknowledge the reality of a situation, you make your side look less and less credible. If a person is truly interested in making a positive change in our legal system, they should first demonstrate good faith by pulling their fingers out of their ears.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | |||||
|
#120
|
|||
|
![]() I wonder how many people are going to Follow zimmerman around at night trying to get him scared enough to "threaten" the follower. Then they can just pull out a gun and shoot him.
street justice | ||
|
![]() |
|
|