This is how you get a thread locked! - Page 12

Japan · #**111** 10-20-2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ooantipostoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But you do, you clearly made it a point of both of you're post's. In no way is this ignorant. I was just pointing out that looking for a girl that enjoys MMO's isnt going to go far and limits you.

lol

Theldios · #**112** 10-20-2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mimixownzall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be in my "1-10" scale, you would have to first be fuck-able.

So, there are a lot of people out there who wouldn't even be on it.

Scale this scale that if she is ready and willing I am fucking! What else you think God made eyelids for!~

purist · #**113** 10-20-2010, 04:29 PM

My scale corresponds to the overwhelming consensus.

On the other hand, you just showed how out of sync yours is with that post.

In what universe are any of the pictured in the first image a THREE and in what universe is the girl with the measuring tape an EIGHT?

President · #**114** 10-20-2010, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My scale corresponds to the overwhelming consensus.

On the other hand, you just showed how out of sync yours is with that post.

In what universe are any of the pictured in the first image a THREE and in what universe is the girl with the measuring tape an EIGHT?

If your scale is fuckable only, you just admitted you would fuck Tralina.

Enjoy that.

President · #**115** 10-20-2010, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My scale corresponds to the overwhelming consensus.

On the other hand, you just showed how out of sync yours is with that post.

In what universe are any of the pictured in the first image a THREE and in what universe is the girl with the measuring tape an EIGHT?

Lets see some picture of your scale please, thanks.

ooantipostoo · #**116** 10-20-2010, 04:32 PM

Just make it simple fat = 0 out of 10

purist · #**117** 10-20-2010, 04:32 PM

Why would my scale be fuckable only?

Akim · #**118** 10-20-2010, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't calibrate my scale by hitting up a local Walmart. It sounds like you have been spending too much time there, my friend.

You have no clue what a 5 is if you think she is one.

I will debate you random guy #107

Think about why you're putting her down, who cares if you think she isn't as attractive as they do.
More-over, if you're right about her being less-attractive than the average female, the fact that she is interested in the same thing they're interested in must affect how they feel towards her, wouldn't you say that is a good thing?
Such a horrible world we live in where women aren't 100% objectified and judged solely on their looks.

Now, on to the scale system. This scale has no scientific medium such as it is left solely up to the observer. And therefore can not possibly be the same as your scale(you're observer A) unless you were exposed to the exact environments and ideas on beauty that observer B has had. Meaning there is no such thing as a universal theory of beauty and it is left purely up to the eye of the observer.

Besides, what is your motive of putting a young lady down.

President · #**119** 10-20-2010, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would my scale be fuckable only?

The overwhelming consensus so far is fuckable only. Exactly which you just said....

Quote:

Now, on to the scale system. This scale has no scientific medium such as it is left solely up to the observer. And therefore can not possibly be the same as your scale(you're observer A) unless you were exposed to the exact environments and ideas on beauty that observer B has had. Meaning there is no such thing as a universal theory of beauty and it is left purely up to the eye of the observ

Very good point, the girl i put in at 7/8 I would consider around a 7. But I know plenty of people who would consider her a 9.

Apparently purist is a male model.

ooantipostoo · #**120** 10-20-2010, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will debate you random guy #107

Think about why you're putting her down, who cares if you think she isn't as attractive as they do.
More-over, if you're right about her being less-attractive than the average female, the fact that she is interested in the same thing they're interested in must affect how they feel towards her, wouldn't you say that is a good thing?
Such a horrible world we live in where women aren't 100% objectified and judged solely on their looks.

Now, on to the scale system. This scale has no scientific medium such as it is left solely up to the observer. And therefore can not possibly be the same as your scale(you're observer A) unless you were exposed to the exact environments and ideas on beauty that observer B has had. Meaning there is no such thing as a universal theory of beauty and it is left purely up to the eye of the observer.

Besides, what is your motive of putting a young lady down.

Objective: You must break em down, before you build them up!