Can't we all just agree on one thing?

[Polycaster]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Teppler always links us to the most entertaining antisemitic propaganda.

Nothing is mentioned of jews, only gay execs who require sexual favors. It would seem to be you are the anti-Semite for assuming that type of behavior is synonymous with them. Although in your defense, recent news stories did seem to back that up, as even some jews noticed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0eeNijdv3I

I take it as a compliment when you refer to me as Teppler, as he was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree. He's been living in your heads rent-free, and I hope to some day replicate that. Perhaps in a few months you'll be accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being Polycaster. I dare to dream of that day.

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is fascinating. Can you teach us more about these pillars?

Read the book. I know that is hard for you shitlibs as the danger of learning something that goes against your beliefs is large.

Originally Posted by Smellybuttface [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ironic that Polycaster/Teppler uses a government link to prove a point, yet goes on ad nauseaum about how the government is lying to us.

Laughable that you think your 'common sense' is so advanced that it can allow you to discount scientific consensus and expertise. Your brain is saturated with anti-liberal Alex Jones-esque conspiracy theories, and you simply parrot nonsense you gobble up from your "sources" and regurgitate it out here expecting us to believe you have an ounce of your own thought process in the equation.

Still have no idea why you think you're a "real American."

I use gov sources because I'm not trying to prove something to myself, I have other sources for that. I use sources that I think the audience will find persuasive. It shouldn't be so shocking to me that I have to explain this, as I know that actual debate and rational argument are anathema to shitlibs such as yourself. Yet somehow it is. You all constantly amaze me with your ignorant claims to knowledge.

We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Relevant video about Alex Jones.

The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

One of my favorite AJ videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGAAhzreGWw

[Pretzelle]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nothing is mentioned of jews, only gay execs who require sexual favors. It would seem to be you are the anti-Semite for assuming that type of behavior is synonymous with them. Although in your defense, recent news stories did seem to back that up, as even some jews noticed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0eeNijdv3I

I take it as a compliment when you refer to me as Teppler, as he was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart got inside your heads to such a degree. He's been living in your heads rent-free, and I hope to some day replicate that. Perhaps in a few months you'll be accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being Polycaster. I dare to dream of that day.




Read the book. I know that is hard for you shitlibs as the danger of learning something that goes against your beliefs is large.




I use gov sources because I'm not trying to prove something to myself, I have other sources for that. I use sources that I think the audience will find persuasive. It shouldn't be so shocking to me that I have to explain this, as I know that actual debate and rational argument are anathema to shitlibs such as yourself. Yet somehow it is. You all constantly amaze me with your ignorant claims to knowledge.

We've already done the AGW thing. Recap: I post evidence that the metrics and methodology of studies X,Y,Z are flawed, thereby disproving the 97% consensus claim. The only attempt at using data to disprove that was to cite those very same studies that claim there is a 97% consensus... One of the more relevant pieces of info was that individual scientists that were supposedly amongst the 97% came forward to say they were not amongst the 97%. You can't get much more debunked than that.




The levels to which you people use AJ as a way to discount valid information is itself a conspiracy theory worthy of AJ. You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

One of my favorite AJ videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGAAhzreGWw

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Wonkie]

Oh r-k theory

Ok ya got me ��

[Hyppon]

You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Teppler... was brilliant. I still enjoy thinking about how a smart guy pretended to be dumb in order to troll dumb people pretending to be smart.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Could someone explain why right-wing lunatics always seem to know so much more about pop music than I do?

[Polycaster]

Originally Posted by Hyppon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

First off, no one is calling you evil. I'm calling you what you are - racist.

Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?
If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hyppon]

Define racism. Can something be both true and racist at the same time?

Ahh, the definition game. A favorite of yours!

If no, please quote what I say that is racist.
If yes, then you are saying racism can be truthful and it is not a rational description, instead it is merely a term to exert power by trying to shame people.

Argument Fallacies
How many can you count to?

You have no arguments, only ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequiturs.

Still waiting on that thorough analysis of your own "evidence"

[Skarne]

Shut up Teppler.