Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 06-16-2012, 03:44 AM
sedrie.bellamie sedrie.bellamie is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sat Jun 16 01:53:47 2012] Tassive tells the guild, 'Spell: Greater Vocaration: Air, Spell: Dictate, Spell: Greater Vocaration: Air, Claw of Phara Dar, Crown of Rile, Shield of Elders'
pics or it did not happen
  #112  
Old 06-16-2012, 04:51 AM
Nuggie Nuggie is offline
Planar Protector

Nuggie's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,829
Default

Anyone who thinks this isn't going to help server stability has to be insane.

Good play BDA.
  #113  
Old 06-16-2012, 10:36 AM
Quizy Quizy is offline
Sarnak

Quizy's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by finalgrunt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just no. You maybe enjoy it when the competition turns into a 24/7 job, but it was never the case on my server (and I know for a fact it wasn't the exception, and few others were the same). And my server was as classic as yours. Now who is out of touch and being whiney here?

A good balance between sharing the fun & pixel and the right touch of competition goes a looong way. Such a hard concept to grasp, I know. All it takes is IB/TR & TMO out of the raid scene to show what EQ was for the rest of us.

Or you can keep thinking EQ was all about griefing, training, cockblocking, poopsocking and cheating to get to the top. Your choice. I feel sorry for you if your server was like this, truly.
I don't believe in training cokcblocking or poopsocking.

I believe in mobilizing for raid targets after they spawn.. which is what TMO does... we do not set 15 people on spawns and wait for them..

Not sure who you are referring to but ALOT of servers including most importanlt Veeshan was COMPETITION For raid mobs..

Sounds like you started playing EQ after LDON and instancing came out.. Im not trying to flame you here im just saying this:

Everyone plays the game different.. we arent BREAKING the RULES playing the way we play.. we just all played competitively in classic and for you to tell me my way is wrong is just as stupid as me calling your playstyle wrong(which i have never done)...

best of luck to you and your playstyle.. mine will NOT change.
__________________
http://www.themysticalorder.net
Quizy - 60 Grandmaster
Quark- 56 Shaman
Bunn - 54 Cleric
  #114  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:04 AM
Bruman Bruman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We got Master Yael also. Acyrid got Maestro I heard. I doubt any guilds will be killing Vox/Naggy so they're probably being left for public raids, which I think is fantastic.
It's funny how on live servers, that was the intent of the banishment. On many servers, that's how it was used too - they became the targets for lowbie guilds or pug raids. Here it just means you level an alt =P
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Leapfrogging is a dick move. It's not about "rules" or "ZOMG IT HAPPENED ON MY SERVER ITS FAIR".
Truth.
  #115  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:15 AM
getsome getsome is offline
Fire Giant

getsome's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quizy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't believe in training cokcblocking or poopsocking.

I believe in mobilizing for raid targets after they spawn.. which is what TMO does... we do not set 15 people on spawns and wait for them.
I am confused, I read an uncontested account that the events leading to your raid vacation was started when you and friends put 15 @ noble. Just trying to make sure I was not misinformed.

I may have poor memory in my old age, I remember a guild who in an attempt to compete in kunark began placing an inordinate amount of personal online waiting for spawns. I will not fault them, because the tactic proved successful. Perhaps you just joined a few months ago and are not familiar with how your friends got where they are today. Prior to that, nothing in kunark was socked.

Looked like a healthy turn of events last night.
  #116  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:40 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quizy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't believe in training cokcblocking or poopsocking.

I believe in mobilizing for raid targets after they spawn.. which is what TMO does... we do not set 15 people on spawns and wait for them..

Not sure who you are referring to but ALOT of servers including most importanlt Veeshan was COMPETITION For raid mobs..

Sounds like you started playing EQ after LDON and instancing came out.. Im not trying to flame you here im just saying this:

Everyone plays the game different.. we arent BREAKING the RULES playing the way we play.. we just all played competitively in classic and for you to tell me my way is wrong is just as stupid as me calling your playstyle wrong(which i have never done)...

best of luck to you and your playstyle.. mine will NOT change.
I'm not one to blame TMO for all the server's woes, but you totally missed the point of Daimadoshi's post. Competition and mobilizing is great but it shouldn't turn into a full time job. Last night there was competition, because every mob respawned at once when the server came back up. We all had advance notice of when the patch was happening, and could therefore get an idea of when it would be finished. Normally when mobs can pop at any time in their insane 96 hour windows, there isn't "competition" in any meaningful sense, because to compete requires spending markedly more time than most casual players have (and also more time than they would have had to spend in classic). I'm not saying rotations are the answer, but rather that casual players WANT to compete, they just can't because the current ruleset encourages anti-competitive behaviour (like poopsocking). If you think it's normal that casual raid guilds get almost no mobs at all on a given week, then you didn't play classic. If you don't think it's normal, then you concede that at least some of what I'm saying has to be right, and that the barriers to competition on this server are unreasonable.

Just to reiterate, I don't think TMO is the evil one here. You guys offered casual guilds free mobs (Gore, Sev, Tal) when you didn't have to and we had some fun times with that. When your suspension is lifted you should consider honouring at least some of Sanluen's post for the benefit of the server.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
Last edited by Lazortag; 06-16-2012 at 11:43 AM..
  #117  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:50 AM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quizy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't believe in training cokcblocking or poopsocking.

I believe in mobilizing for raid targets after they spawn.. which is what TMO does... we do not set 15 people on spawns and wait for them..
TMO is great at mobilizing, but I've been in too many poopsock races with TMO to know that this is simply not true. I don't know what the raid scene looked like the last two months, but if TMO hasn't been poopsocking, it's only because no one wants to poopsock with them.

On another note, if TMO really wanted the competition that they always claim to want, it'd probably be in their best interest to leave every mob up until the competition showed up since it's ultimately a FTE race anyway. May as well save everyone's time.
Last edited by Ravager; 06-16-2012 at 12:06 PM..
  #118  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:13 PM
India India is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 501
Default

What it really boils down to is different playstyles. It's an age old argument that has been going on since original EQ. Casuals vs. raiders.

Those that play casually want to raid on "their terms" - in a manner that suits their playstyle

Those that play to raid want to do so on "their terms" - in a manner that suits their playstyle

To say one playstyle is "more right" or "better" than another is bull and everyone knows it, yet everyone continues to argue about it and it's ridiculous.

In that vein, what I am interested in is seeing Nilbogs proposal... will the server now impose set raiding rules that support the casual player base or will those proposed raid rules be fair to both styles of playing?
  #119  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:19 PM
Bruman Bruman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by India [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In that vein, what I am interested in is seeing Nilbogs proposal... will the server now impose set raiding rules that support the casual player base or will those proposed raid rules be fair to both styles of playing?
I think we're all interested!

I think "tiers" of raiding would help, so that if you're in VP, old gods are off limits for example, but that's kind of all buggered because of epics! I like to think if it wasn't for that, CT and Inny would be more open.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Leapfrogging is a dick move. It's not about "rules" or "ZOMG IT HAPPENED ON MY SERVER ITS FAIR".
Truth.
  #120  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:42 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am confused, I read an uncontested account that the events leading to your raid vacation was started when you and friends put 15 @ noble. Just trying to make sure I was not misinformed.

I may have poor memory in my old age, I remember a guild who in an attempt to compete in kunark began placing an inordinate amount of personal online waiting for spawns. I will not fault them, because the tactic proved successful. Perhaps you just joined a few months ago and are not familiar with how your friends got where they are today. Prior to that, nothing in kunark was socked.

Looked like a healthy turn of events last night.
it was a race to noble spawn im sure even in your old age you remember how the noble cycle works here
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.