Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12091  
Old 01-04-2022, 12:31 AM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I remember hearing about a baker who refused to bake a cake for the name Adolf Hitler, and I believe was allowed to refuse. They complained to a supervisor and the supervisor told them basically to piss off

I remember being amazed that someone could even legally name their kid Hitler. Their other kid was named Aryan Nation too. You know their childhoods are gonna be fucked

https://www.nj.com/news/2008/12/chil...lf_hitler.html

Now I’m wondering could you name your kid Satan? I coulda swore there were names that were legally off limits
Those names should qualify as child abuse and instant sterilization and permanent hospitalization on a maximum security ward. Problem solved.

Also how those parents are still alive and their neighbors/communities just turn a blind eye...

I just wanted to come right out and say I'm like Neoamish, orthodox superjew, and uber muslim all wrapped up in one very disappointed and disenfranchised and irritated package.
Last edited by starkind; 01-04-2022 at 12:36 AM..
  #12092  
Old 01-04-2022, 12:40 AM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,358
Default

Maybe the state should just randomly assign numbers to people. And should not legally recognize any alias they use outside of their RNG picked number. Nor any other qualities.

You're just a simple crypto key that authenticates ur entity. It's all dumb tho when we start thinking tooo hard about it.
  #12093  
Old 01-04-2022, 12:41 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Those names should qualify as child abuse and instant sterilization and permanent hospitalization on a maximum security ward. Problem solved.

Also how those parents are still alive and their neighbors/communities just turn a blind eye...

I just wanted to come right out and say I'm like Neoamish, orthodox superjew, and uber muslim all wrapped up in one very disappointed and disenfranchised and irritated package.
Yeah as a mandated reporter myself I dunno how that family wouldn’t be drowning in CPS reports from teachers. “Your name is what?” “Adolf Hitler ma’am”

I’ve definitely come across some pretty dumb names in my job, never that bad though. But when we see a really dumb name sometimes my co-workers and I joke privately to each other “well that’s why your kid is suicidal….”
  #12094  
Old 01-04-2022, 12:45 AM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,358
Default

Yeah I agree. Sorry you have to deal with that.

Thanks for trying.
  #12095  
Old 01-04-2022, 12:56 AM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 4,972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How did the cake get a gender identity?

Also iirc the first case had some message or flag on it... it wasn't just a cake it was speech.

If I'm a website or publisher. I'm not obligated to let u post anything. For any reason. Especially if I'm a private entity. (People don't exist anymore).

That lady looks like a mega twat. Can I plz refuse to bake a cake with her ugly energy vibes plastard all over it? On the grounds that it's way toooo hard to ice a hate cake?
She's a lawyer is how. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #12096  
Old 01-04-2022, 01:41 AM
Elizondo Elizondo is offline
Planar Protector

Elizondo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,725
Default

nobody understands what the issue is. Nada to do with bakin a cake.

social media companies have direct control over freedom of speech and the issue is if twitter and facebook are colluding with 1 party (hint: dems) to suppress the political speech of their opposition which is what's happening

that's the reason why the dems kept callin up the ceos to coerce/pressure them into censoring content they disagreed with. the issue isn't a private company doing anything here on their own volition. the issue are politicians applying pressure or selectively providing benefits to remove protections and amendments provided within the constitution for everyone, regardless of political identity

like if zuckerbucks does what the dems want, maybe this will go away or he'll get a slap on the wrist. Makes more sense now why he spent so much money to get dems elected in 2020 too

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/11/tech/...now/index.html

it's like if we still lived in a pre internet world and the dems threatened to investigate newspapers for printing republican campaign ads. that's basically what's happening and it's dirty. anyone who supports it is a coward and a not see

230 needs to revised
  #12097  
Old 01-04-2022, 03:29 AM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

politicians control the superbowl outcomes:

  #12098  
Old 01-04-2022, 03:35 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

She’s objectively attractive, obviously. Teeth a bit big but we’ll let that slide. If we’re just going on looks, I’d bang her. Acknowledging that attractiveness publicly in this way comes across as vain on her part. I personally don’t mind a little vanity now and again; I always say that the sin of vanity can be something that keeps people on track with health goals. But it’s not a good look for a politician

And apparently she said it because of people ripping on her bf’s fashion sense. This is after the media completely shit on Melania Trump’s fashion throughout Trump’s presidency. Kinda hypocritical and naive to clutch your pearls about it now

Edit: AOC, the fact that everyone, including you, knows you could better than your bf, looks-wise, is probably why you’re so goddamn defensive about it
Last edited by Rogean; 04-17-2024 at 05:01 PM..
  #12099  
Old 01-04-2022, 03:56 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

I knew this looks mismatch in my personal life. One of my stepdad’s relatives was an objectively really good looking dude. Always in tip top shape, with a face like that looked like a more attractive version of that Tim Teebow football player a lot of the chicks liked. I would guess that if you gathered up 20 chicks to rate his looks he would have mostly 10’s maybe some 9’s and 8’s

And his wife to me was about a 7. Like a low 7. Not bad, but enough of a “he could do better” that I assumed she must just be dynamite in bed or something to make him stay married and faithful

But nah, turns out he cheated on her. Like a lot. They’ve since divorced, despite having kids together. You gotta watch out for those looks mismatches…
  #12100  
Old 01-04-2022, 04:01 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
She’s objectively attractive, obviously. Teeth a bit big but we’ll let that slide. If we’re just going on looks, I’d bang her. Acknowledging that attractiveness publicly in this way comes across as vain on her part. I personally don’t mind a little vanity now and again; I always say that the sin of vanity can be something that keeps people on track with health goals. But it’s not a good look for a politician

And apparently she said it because of people ripping on her bf’s fashion sense. This is after the media completely shit on Melania Trump’s fashion throughout Trump’s presidency. Kinda hypocritical and naive to clutch your pearls about it now

Edit: AOC, the fact that everyone, including you, knows you could better than your bf, looks-wise, is probably why you’re so goddamn defensive about it
To be fair he probably didn't think he was getting put up on Twitter.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.