![]() |
|
![]() Quote:
Also how those parents are still alive and their neighbors/communities just turn a blind eye... I just wanted to come right out and say I'm like Neoamish, orthodox superjew, and uber muslim all wrapped up in one very disappointed and disenfranchised and irritated package. | |||
Last edited by starkind; 01-04-2022 at 12:36 AM..
|
|
|
![]() Maybe the state should just randomly assign numbers to people. And should not legally recognize any alias they use outside of their RNG picked number. Nor any other qualities.
You're just a simple crypto key that authenticates ur entity. It's all dumb tho when we start thinking tooo hard about it. | ||
|
|
![]() Quote:
I’ve definitely come across some pretty dumb names in my job, never that bad though. But when we see a really dumb name sometimes my co-workers and I joke privately to each other “well that’s why your kid is suicidal….” | |||
|
|
![]() Yeah I agree. Sorry you have to deal with that.
Thanks for trying. | ||
|
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
|
![]() nobody understands what the issue is. Nada to do with bakin a cake.
social media companies have direct control over freedom of speech and the issue is if twitter and facebook are colluding with 1 party (hint: dems) to suppress the political speech of their opposition which is what's happening that's the reason why the dems kept callin up the ceos to coerce/pressure them into censoring content they disagreed with. the issue isn't a private company doing anything here on their own volition. the issue are politicians applying pressure or selectively providing benefits to remove protections and amendments provided within the constitution for everyone, regardless of political identity like if zuckerbucks does what the dems want, maybe this will go away or he'll get a slap on the wrist. Makes more sense now why he spent so much money to get dems elected in 2020 too https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/11/tech/...now/index.html it's like if we still lived in a pre internet world and the dems threatened to investigate newspapers for printing republican campaign ads. that's basically what's happening and it's dirty. anyone who supports it is a coward and a not see 230 needs to revised | ||
|
|
![]() politicians control the superbowl outcomes:
| ||
|
|
![]() She’s objectively attractive, obviously. Teeth a bit big but we’ll let that slide. If we’re just going on looks, I’d bang her. Acknowledging that attractiveness publicly in this way comes across as vain on her part. I personally don’t mind a little vanity now and again; I always say that the sin of vanity can be something that keeps people on track with health goals. But it’s not a good look for a politician
And apparently she said it because of people ripping on her bf’s fashion sense. This is after the media completely shit on Melania Trump’s fashion throughout Trump’s presidency. Kinda hypocritical and naive to clutch your pearls about it now Edit: AOC, the fact that everyone, including you, knows you could better than your bf, looks-wise, is probably why you’re so goddamn defensive about it | ||
Last edited by Rogean; 04-17-2024 at 05:01 PM..
|
|
|
![]() I knew this looks mismatch in my personal life. One of my stepdad’s relatives was an objectively really good looking dude. Always in tip top shape, with a face like that looked like a more attractive version of that Tim Teebow football player a lot of the chicks liked. I would guess that if you gathered up 20 chicks to rate his looks he would have mostly 10’s maybe some 9’s and 8’s
And his wife to me was about a 7. Like a low 7. Not bad, but enough of a “he could do better” that I assumed she must just be dynamite in bed or something to make him stay married and faithful But nah, turns out he cheated on her. Like a lot. They’ve since divorced, despite having kids together. You gotta watch out for those looks mismatches… | ||
|
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
![]() |
|
|