religion

[Eliseus]

Mind you, anyone is a "troll" that disagrees with him.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, like Darwin. I even pointed out him contradicting himself. How is that kind of stuff more credible?

And yet you once again ignore the fact that Darwin merely got the ball rolling. Unlike creationist beliefs, 90% of what Darin wrote on evolution has been corrected/improved upon by the scientific community in the last century and a half. Just like any other field of science to exist.

I mean, if we were to follow your line of thinking you'd have to assume that Boeing has a dusty book written by the Wright brothers that they base all of their aircraft designs on.

[Whirled]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stop openly using the word troll like you are any better.

Why did you of all people respond to that? I've explicitly stated yesterday that you were one of the few people in this thread NOT trolling. Do you just dismiss everything that's been presented so far when you make a post?

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Notice that he doesn't even argue any inaccuracy or misinformation, or anything. He just simple calls robot a fucking retard for researching what he is saying.

I dont respond to intellectually lazy dribble. If Robot has a point to make he can use his own words and we can address each claim he makes point by point. To ask me to go through paragraph after paragraph of some copy/pasted tripe that has gone on for 80+ pages is asinine.

BTW, I dont even think Robot has read or understood some of the copy/pasted text he slapped up. Take this post for instance:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=901

Guess where that post comes from. It comes from here:

http://www.chess.com/groups/forumvie...ments-debunked

Notice the title of the article? 18 Creationist Arguments DEBUNKED. That's right. Your hero Robot copy/pasted from THAT site. Apparently, he doesnt even read the titles of the articles nor does he understand what they are actually saying. He thought he was providing more evidence but he was only showing what a fucking lazy and dishonest idiot he was.

So tell me...why am I suppose to debate with him?

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please realize that some sources are more reliable/accurate/factual than others. You've been scraping the bottom of the barrel the whole time.

Please show your sources to support your claim to the contrary.

My source by the way is called history and facts.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show your sources to support your claim to the contrary.

My source by the way is called history and facts.

You wouldnt know a fact if it bite your face off. Go back to copy/pasting so we can all ignore you.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show your sources to support your claim to the contrary.

My source by the way is called history and facts.

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont respond to intellectually lazy dribble. If Robot has a point to make he can use his own words and we can address each claim he makes point by point. To ask me to go through paragraph after paragraph of some copy/pasted tripe that has gone on for 80+ pages is asinine.

BTW, I dont even think Robot has read or understood some of the copy/pasted text he slapped up. Take this post for instance:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=901

Guess where that post comes from. It comes from here:

http://www.chess.com/groups/forumvie...ments-debunked

Notice the title of the article? 18 Creationist Arguments DEBUNKED. That's right. Your hero Robot copy/pasted from THAT site. Apparently, he doesnt even read the titles of the articles nor does he understand what they are actually saying. He thought he was providing more evidence but he was only showing what a fucking lazy and dishonest idiot he was.

So tell me...why am I suppose to debate with him?

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont respond to intellectually lazy dribble. If Robot has a point to make he can use his own words and we can address each claim he makes point by point. To ask me to go through paragraph after paragraph of some copy/pasted tripe that has gone on for 80+ pages is asinine.

BTW, I dont even think Robot has read or understood some of the copy/pasted text he slapped up. Take this post for instance:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=901

Guess where that post comes from. It comes from here:

http://www.chess.com/groups/forumvie...ments-debunked

Notice the title of the article? 18 Creationist Arguments DEBUNKED. That's right. Your hero Robot copy/pasted from THAT site. Apparently, he doesnt even read the titles of the articles nor does he understand what they are actually saying. He thought he was providing more evidence but he was only showing what a fucking lazy and dishonest idiot he was.

So tell me...why am I suppose to debate with him?

So your 5 page long anecdotal story about how blood clotting happened by fully formed organs borrowing cells from other fully formed organs was all you? You typed that entire thing out? In your own words?

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So your 5 page long anecdotal story about how blood clotting happened by fully formed organs borrowing cells from other fully formed organs was all you? You typed that entire thing out? In your own words?

No, if you notice before I started posting page long copy/pasted text I called Robot out on it. I did it simply to mock him and show how lazy/dishonest it was. Notice, no one responded to my copy/pasted text right? I think it proved the point rather well. Copy/pasted garbage is garbage...no one even needs to respond to it.