Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Gloomlord]

Why are you still here? You don't need to "defend yourself". I mean...we're all "lost causes", right?

Nobody is forcing you to post either, you lying hypocrite.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why are you still here? You don't need to "defend yourself". I mean...we're all "lost causes", right?

Nobody is forcing you to post either, you lying hypocrite.

I am providing the correct information for other people reading. If you can disprove my argument, that would be fantastic. Everybody wins, including myself.

You aren't lost causes. You are simply caught in a trolling loop. It happens. I haven't blocked anybody here, nor am I holding any grudges.

[Troxx]

There are no other people reading.

[Ripqozko]

Imagine trying to win in a 23 year old elf sim forums

[Gloomlord]

Except, by implication of the fact we're "trolls", we seem to be. You're contradicting yourself. And what do you mean "other people reading"? Even the one person giving you the small benefit of the doubt is hardly calling for us to "stop trolling".

Do you mean the silent observers browsing this thread? That's pretty presumptuous to think that they perceive you to be anything other than a childish troll.

It's checkmate. Now stop posting, you infantile attention seeker.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except, by implication of the fact we're "trolls", we seem to be. You're contradicting yourself. And what do you mean "other people reading"? Even the one person giving you the small benefit of the doubt is hardly calling for us to "stop trolling".

Do you mean the silent observers browsing this thread? That's pretty presumptuous to think that they perceive you to be anything other than a childish troll.

It's checkmate. Now stop posting, you infantile attention seeker.

It's pretty obvious to anybody reading that 500+ posts containing nothing but memes and insults is trolling. I am calling it for what it is. Everybody invovled in posting those insults and memes have more than earned the title of troll for this thread. That is not how you win a debate against someone you disagree with.

Again, I hold no grudges. People sometimes get into trolling loops. I will gladly engage with you if you bring evidence and logic to counter my argument.

[Kich867]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except, by implication of the fact we're "trolls", we seem to be. You're contradicting yourself. And what do you mean "other people reading"? Even the one person giving you the small benefit of the doubt is hardly calling for us to "stop trolling".

Do you mean the silent observers browsing this thread? That's pretty presumptuous to think that they perceive you to be anything other than a childish troll.

It's checkmate. Now stop posting, you infantile attention seeker.

Is that me? Idrc that the thread is going on or that people are shit talking, I do think its funny though that this dude's ramblings evokes such an enormous emotional response from this many people, he has to live rent free in a lot of heads.

That one dude was sitting here for like 16 hours spam refreshing so he could drop his weird copy-pasta after every single person's post. The best part about that though was, I actually went and read some of that thread he said he had backed this dude into a corner in, it was pretty fuckin cringe. The entire argument was an enormously flaccid floppy weiner of an argument.

FWIW I actually disagree with DSM though on the original topic, but more so because I think that the fourth person functionally doesn't matter. That person doesn't relevantly contribute to the groups kill speed, anything over a trio (or duo really) seems obnoxious since they would have to pull gargantuan weight for their presence to offset how much they just reduced the XP per kill, but gun to my head I'd probably argue for a druid because at least keeping enemies snared prevents them from running, they can root-rot as well if that's actually an argument, and they can teleport the group wherever they'd like to go, and evac in a worst case scenario.

So I would opt for whoever has the most value to that group outside of combat, that group will kill things too quickly for a fourth person's in-combat contribution to matter.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is that me? Idrc that the thread is going on or that people are shit talking, I do think its funny though that this dude's ramblings evokes such an enormous emotional response from this many people, he has to live rent free in a lot of heads.

That one dude was sitting here for like 16 hours spam refreshing so he could drop his weird copy-pasta after every single person's post. The best part about that though was, I actually went and read some of that thread he said he had backed this dude into a corner in, it was pretty fuckin cringe. The entire argument was an enormously flaccid floppy weiner of an argument.

FWIW I actually disagree with DSM though on the original topic, but more so because I think that the fourth person functionally doesn't matter. That person doesn't relevantly contribute to the groups kill speed, anything over a trio (or duo really) seems obnoxious since they would have to pull gargantuan weight for their presence to offset how much they just reduced the XP per kill, but gun to my head I'd probably argue for a druid because at least keeping enemies snared prevents them from running, they can root-rot as well if that's actually an argument, and they can teleport the group wherever they'd like to go, and evac in a worst case scenario.

So I would opt for whoever has the most value to that group outside of combat, that group will kill things too quickly for a fourth person's in-combat contribution to matter.

Thanks for being a calm and rational poster. I have enjoyed all of your posts. I do agree with you, once you get to a four man group it doesn't matter as much. Duos or Trios are where class compositions matter a lot more. But OP asked for our opinions on a four man group, and we obliged.

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is that me? Idrc that the thread is going on or that people are shit talking, I do think its funny though that this dude's ramblings evokes such an enormous emotional response from this many people, he has to live rent free in a lot of heads.

That one dude was sitting here for like 16 hours spam refreshing so he could drop his weird copy-pasta after every single person's post. The best part about that though was, I actually went and read some of that thread he said he had backed this dude into a corner in, it was pretty fuckin cringe. The entire argument was an enormously flaccid floppy weiner of an argument.

FWIW I actually disagree with DSM though on the original topic, but more so because I think that the fourth person functionally doesn't matter. That person doesn't relevantly contribute to the groups kill speed, anything over a trio (or duo really) seems obnoxious since they would have to pull gargantuan weight for their presence to offset how much they just reduced the XP per kill, but gun to my head I'd probably argue for a druid because at least keeping enemies snared prevents them from running, they can root-rot as well if that's actually an argument, and they can teleport the group wherever they'd like to go, and evac in a worst case scenario.

So I would opt for whoever has the most value to that group outside of combat, that group will kill things too quickly for a fourth person's in-combat contribution to matter.

You see? That's what I meant with "small benefit of the doubt".

Maybe you think some people are going too far in their anger with him, but it's clear DSM has no idea what he's talking about.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You see? That's what I meant with "small benefit of the doubt".

Maybe you think some people are going too far in their anger with him, but it's clear DSM has no idea what he's talking about.

I could say the same thing about you, and we would be at an impasse. You are not some arbiter of the truth who gets to dismiss what other people are saying.

The difference is I have data to back up my posts, while you just keep posting in anger. You could back up your points with evidence or stop posting at any time.