#121
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll make a fee of 100pp to use it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
#122
|
|||
|
The whole thing seems like a headache with a lot of paperwork involved. Difficult to explain, gonna be difficult to enforce. What is so bad about removing variance and having some kind of a rotation or a limit that a guild can't re-kill the same target during the next three spawns?
| ||
|
#123
|
|||
|
Due to FE and IB getting 1 vote each on the council, they would be immune to sanctions which require 5/6.
This is assuming they are still raiding as a unit rather than splitting into 2 guilds. | ||
|
#124
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also everybody needs to stop proposing that variance is reduced that is OFF THE TABLE at this time. | |||
|
#125
|
||||
|
Quote:
By that same argument ANY guilds on the "council" could form an alliance against the others and make themselves immune, you're simply singling out FE/IB because they already have had a relationship in place. | |||
|
#126
|
||||
|
I just talked with some people in IB and they haven't agreed with this proposal.
Just like to let people know that this is an FE & TMO proposal. I'd like to wait and see what the other guilds, including IB would like to propose or what system they would like to back.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
#127
|
||||
|
Quote:
...Except for the big where if TMO alt #23049834 needs a piece of gear, TMO will totally track that thing. =) Good try. -Cross | |||
|
#128
|
|||
|
FE/IB have essentially been acting like one guild, so they should be treated as one until they present otherwise.
| ||
|
#129
|
|||
|
tl;dr
i'd like to make an official proposal to keep all proposals to a two-sentence minimum. This is a sample second sentence. | ||
|
#130
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|