Bandwagon Proposal Thread. - Page 13

Nune · #**121** 12-31-2013, 06:38 PM

This proposal is the best one so far. Unfortunately this, like the "Tier A" people acting kindly and constructive towards each other, is only because in 2 days if you don't all sign on one of these dotted lines the reason you woke up for the last 3+ years is going to be taken away from you. This is just a video game, a minor escape from the real world. People called Alarti's work and tried to get him fired (or whatever dumbass reason it was) because the line between 14 year old elf simulator and human beings is completely blurred to some of you. My guild, and most of the people i run with, have done next to 0 raiding on P99 because of the same people now reaching out to the community with masked, selfish intentions.

Personally, I won't be heartbroken if raiding gets taken away from you all. Because let's be honest, this is more about making sure you get to keep doing what you want to versus making sure everyone gets to do what they want. Of course the guild(s) that posted their raid loot spreadsheets in threads constantly, mocking people who tried raids and failed, and got caught red-handed duping/exploiting are now white knights. Get fucking real, you're a bunch of forgettable faces trying to be named prom king at your high school reunion. Irrelevant when it mattered, scourge when given a second chance.

I hope for guilds like Taken, Azure Guard, the newer members of IB/TMO who are recently doing well enough to see some dragons but haven't gotten an honest chance, something gets agreed upon because I think it's childish to subject the entire server to the drama of the 1%. This mentality has always been why I have had issues with authority my whole life. When it becomes too much effort, generalize. Because if you could give me a legit reason why Azure Guard couldn't raid the few days they do due to poopsock/FRAPS/petition wars, I would concede and go all in on this doomsday timeline. Guilds/people like them, my guild for that matter, have had 0% of a hand in the perpetual bullshit state of the server, and we are now 48 hours away from being subjected to it.

Mac Dretti · #**122** 12-31-2013, 06:40 PM

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 129
User Name Posts
Alarti0001 31

Alarti0001 · #**123** 12-31-2013, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac Dretti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 129
User Name Posts
Alarti0001 31

Mac Dretti 56 total posts... 0 posts with substance. Anon troll ignore engaged.

Spitty · #**124** 12-31-2013, 06:50 PM

But he has such attitude in that avatar that you know he means srs bsns.

BlkCamel · #**125** 12-31-2013, 06:55 PM

Mac Dretti · #**126** 12-31-2013, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mac Dretti 56 total posts... 0 posts with substance. Anon troll ignore engaged.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Spitty · #**127** 12-31-2013, 07:06 PM

I'm thinking he's like KISS without a cock.

What I mean is, he's like a band without the D.

What I'm saying is, ban.

In closing, get the fuck out.

Mac Dretti · #**128** 12-31-2013, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

mac dretti u reppin' the 707 or u just a poseur?

Why would I be a poseur for not living in 707?

U dum or somethin?

Racun · #**129** 12-31-2013, 07:38 PM

I see nothing in here about FTE sniping.. can you please add something that states something along the lines of "FTE will not be valid unless we have x number of people ready to engage mob (and by ready to engage mob I mean not sitting outside fear portal ready to zone in, I mean actually in zone where it is easy to verify who is "ready to engage").

Need to make it simple - like a static number across the board rather than a number for each specific target. DA stalling would then not be an issue as you would be breaking this rule by DA stalling without sufficient numbers ready to engage the target.

Please also add another rule that states accidental trains are just as guilty as purposeful trains and agree to stop the ridiculous trains to trak ledge and the fraps & petitionquest that occurs with so many of the encounters in the game.

These underhanded tactics are what stifle "competition" on this server, not lack of will by "Tier B" guilds to want to attempt the targets.

Alarti0001 · #**130** 12-31-2013, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I see nothing in here about FTE sniping.. can you please add something that states something along the lines of "FTE will not be valid unless we have x number of people ready to engage mob (and by ready to engage mob I mean not sitting outside fear portal ready to zone in, I mean actually in zone where it is easy to verify who is "ready to engage").

Need to make it simple - like a static number across the board rather than a number for each specific target. DA stalling would then not be an issue as you would be breaking this rule by DA stalling without sufficient numbers ready to engage the target.

Please also add another rule that states accidental trains are just as guilty as purposeful trains and agree to stop the ridiculous trains to trak ledge and the fraps & petitionquest that occurs with so many of the encounters in the game.

These underhanded tactics are what stifle "competition" on this server, not lack of will by "Tier B" guilds to want to attempt the targets.

FTE sniping should be allowed. Who determines what a minimum kill force is?

I don't see a reason for accidental trains to be marked as purposeful. The point is for the guilds to mediate their own disputes and to only approach the GM's as a last resort.

Accidental trains are rare.

Tier B guilds can come up with whatever ruleset they want for their raid mobs.