Freedom From Atheism Foundation

[dreama1]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What the fuck are you talking about. Most the things we believe in this world are base of what you just mentioned. Look at most our scientific studies are all theories, not fact.

Ok, you don't know science, so please stop talking.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Simulation theory being accurate would destroy every single religion that has ever been conceived by man.

You dont actually think that when people argue that there isnt evidence that gods exist that they are including the creator of the simulation do you? I would say a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of .1% of the world even knows about this theory.

You have to argue against known and accepted definitions of words and what they mean colloquially or you are just publicly mentally masturbating to show people how "open minded" you are.

Not really, maybe it is part of the simulation to create many religions that are all correct to see the outcome! lol!

[dreama1]

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On what planet, in what solar system and in which galaxy would locking a child in a basement and torturing it for decades ever be considered "moral"?

Go back 300 years, hell go to some countries right now.

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Science can prove with empirical evidence what is good for human well being.

got prof?

There is no 'science of morality.' That is complete bullshit. Morality is largely a social phenomenon with some biological underpinnings.

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you dont define human morality as "what can maximize human freedom and minimize human suffering" then you are not defining morality correctly and there is no need to argue with you.
.

"what can maximize human freedom and minimize human suffering" is the most absurd & vague statement I have ever heard in my life. Let me guess, sam harris?

[dreama1]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence BUT more importantly it is not evidence of presence, either.

[Lojik]

If I name my son God would people still debate his existence?

[Ikonoclastia]

Originally Posted by dreama1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Go back 300 years, hell go to some countries right now.



got prof?

There is no 'science of morality.' That is complete bullshit. Morality is largely a social phenomenon with some biological underpinnings.



"what can maximize human freedom and minimize human suffering" is the most absurd & vague statement I have ever heard in my life. Let me guess, sam harris?

If it was good for our species survival to burn every 3rd baby alive then our society would have evolved to burn every 3rd baby alive.

Any detractors would have long ago been bred out of the gene pool as they suffered from the negative effects of not burning.

In big cities we walk past families and individuals all the time who often starve or freeze to death on the streets.

Both are horrid things. One you accept as moral one you wouldn't. Morality is fickle like human kindness.

[Emsee]

Bottom line is you put invisible lines in your head and are the premise of what is wrong with this world. Who gives a fuck what you think is right or wrong. You are not nor will ever be the epitome nor truth of what is or what will ever be.

Way to reach on the obscure lines of morality, I doubt anyone disagrees with that fact. You are nothing more than the disdained minority claiming victim rhetoric by nothing more than hyperbole indications, that have very little to do with anything that could be viewed as truth, anywhere.

[Rhuma7]

I would like to remind those in this thread that...You wouldn't argue micro-economics with a 2 year old because they dont have the mental capacity to give an educated response nor should you expect one.

Arguing with religious folk would fall under the same analogy and you should be ashamed of yourself for even trying.

Religious people are brought up on it and have been fed it since before they could even read a bedtime story, never even mind the bible.

You will NEVER, EVER change their way of thinking.

[Emsee]

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Meaningless white noise

Congratulations on taking an entire argument and refuting with absolutely zero substance. This is your issue Lron. You post assanine content without a shred of thought. This is why you stick to self narcassistic dipshit self-centered content. And is the fact that why you are nothing short of a fucking joke.

[Rhuma7]

Originally Posted by Lron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was brought up on it but i broke free from the chains of religion, I have also been a catalyst to many friends exile from theirs.

So saying I will never ever change someones way of thinking is empirically and categorically false.

You did that on your own sir. Nobody changed your mind, at least I would assume so.

Christopher Hitchins was quite a guy though, so you never know.