good job azrael

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by ricquire [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can see it, but everquest was built on a 72 man raid metagame, that was merely an example.

Kunark was not build on a 72 man raid metagame. Neither was Velious. Legacy of Steel / FoH, these guilds weren't raiding 72 deep in Velious, I have no idea where you got that idea. The 72 man thing didn't come in until Planes of Power. If you think somehow raiding dragons that take 19-21 people in Kunark with 72 people, on a server that struggles to break 120 consecutive players on a daily basis is acceptable, than maybe you should just play a game with instances and actual challenging PvE like WoW.

[Not Salem]

Originally Posted by Kinamaara

Everytime a GM takes action against a player without surefire proof, server gets a little worse.

There's been going such obvious 2-boxing on for so long, and then suddenly GMs hand out account suspensions for thinking someone maybe trained someone, without proof.

Where's the consistency?

I thought for a while, it was starting to brighten up, but then Aussie logs in and flushes it out the shitter. Show us the proof, or apologize!

little late dawg, been suspended 4 times in the last 3 months for things I never did, all petitions by your guild

[ricquire]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kunark was not build on a 72 man raid metagame. Neither was Velious. Legacy of Steel / FoH, these guilds weren't raiding 72 deep in Velious, I have no idea where you got that idea. The 72 man thing didn't come in until Planes of Power. If you think somehow raiding dragons that take 19-21 people in Kunark with 72 people, on a server that struggles to break 120 consecutive players on a daily basis is acceptable, than maybe you should just play a game with instances and actual challenging PvE like WoW.

You are wrong.

Just because the UI did not support the 72 man format does not mean that guilds at that point did not have obscene numbers.

When Vis Maior first killed the content on Quellious, in direct competition with FoH/AL, they had at minimum all times > 50 people.

To say 30 to 40 people is a zerg is not classic EQ.

[Colgate]

you can kill anything in kunark with 4 or fewer groups, so bringing 40 people is in fact zerging it

[Not Salem]

30-40 zerg status for sure

[ricquire]

Regardless, my only stake in the fight is about poor customer service. Both inconsistent and unprofessional.

[Sweetbaby Jesus]

I acquired node for blue plat, good try tho. I could get a guild here if I cared to play...i was already bored and the events just gave me an excuse to move on.

[Pitborn]

Originally Posted by Agatha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They can't handle a little 2v30 dungeon pvp and have to still petition quest. When will the terror end. When will a 2nd guild come along.

What did you think you were going to accomplish 2v30 anways?

You aren't that good.

[Pitborn]

Originally Posted by Sweetbaby Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I acquired node for blue plat, good try tho. I could get a guild here if I cared to play...i was already bored and the events just gave me an excuse to move on.

The Ol " Blue Plat " transaction eh......

[Colgate]

Originally Posted by Not Salem [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

30-40 zerg status for sure

? we called nihilum a zerg 20x a day every day for bringing numbers like that, now suddenly it's not a zerg

ho-kay