as suspected

[Runya]

Originally Posted by Grimjaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

first, we'll need a 10U blade server / 16 blades (Each zone hosted by its own server). no less than 128gig ram. we'll also need fibre across the board, from rack all the way to the backbone, with at least a dedicated 1 GBps UPLOAD just for RED ($1000 a month)

whats our current upload at?

[Colgate]

i will bring our entire raidforce to every single raid target and there's nothing you can do to stop me

[Runya]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i will bring our entire raidforce to every single raid target and there's nothing you can do to stop me

I hope 200 more log in.....with an alliance less targets...hook it up

[Guido]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i will bring our entire raidforce to every single raid target and there's nothing you can do to stop me

in the end - you are still a 20 year old soon-to-be man, trapped in a little 12 year olds body

I'd be more concerned about hitting the gym than how many warm bodies you are able to produce

think about it.

[hatelore]

Does that make you a middle aged man trapped in a bad man's body andith?

[Agatha]

discussion is off topic, like to again say, if no guild cap or community coming together to find a way to make it possible to PVP for dragons.

what kind of donations are we looking for here to make this server so lag free the euro's feel like they are united citizens?

my checkbook is out and so are a few others. what we need.

[mrproudbeard]

This isn't necessarily an issue more hardware can solve. If the code has a shitty algorithm buried in it somewhere then better hardware isn't really gonna help much potentially. It'd take someone with server access and codebase access to do some profiling to figure out why the desynchs occur. Unless someone in the know understands the problem blindly throwing more hardware resources at it is a bad use of time. Unless the hardware were on now is knowingly underpowered and bad. But really a piece of trash 1U is likely much more powerful than whatever hardware Sony ran EQ on in live especially in the 1999 time frame.

[Grimjaw]

Originally Posted by mrproudbeard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This isn't necessarily an issue more hardware can solve. If the code has a shitty algorithm buried in it somewhere then better hardware isn't really gonna help much potentially. It'd take someone with server access and codebase access to do some profiling to figure out why the desynchs occur. Unless someone in the know understands the problem blindly throwing more hardware resources at it is a bad use of time. Unless the hardware were on now is knowingly underpowered and bad. But really a piece of trash 1U is likely much more powerful than whatever hardware Sony ran EQ on in live especially in the 1999 time frame.

basically blue runs fine and doesnt have these problems. so unless the problem is where the code changes the players name from blue to red, then its the hardware....

[Jimmybones]

There always has to be a number one and whoever is at the top gets all the hate. Why can't you nerds just play everquest without crying about something all the time?

[Agatha]

Originally Posted by Jimmybones [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There always has to be a number one and whoever is at the top gets all the hate. Why can't you nerds just play everquest without crying about something all the time?

this isnt about who is number one, this is about how this server cant provide a route to figuring out who is number 1.