Snaj <BDA> camp stealer and griefer

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BDA is pretty quick to discredit anyone that leaves them, but I think that's its biggest strength. A great guild for forming great guilds. FE and Omni are / were two amazingly successful splits from BDA which simply wouldn't have happened without BDA being the exceptionally welcoming, albeit dissatisfying guild that it is. So thanks for being you, BDA.

Ya. Both those guilds outlasted BDA/do things.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah the people from FE caused two more splinters and are now the core of Forsaken? Omni is fine I guess, if you measure your success by teaming up with two other guilds to kill stuff.

Versus measuring success with a huge in house army? EQ is a social game and working with other guilds to accomplish things is part of it, something our huge guilds in P99 usually forget. Yeah they do their thing and it works for them. So yes, very successful guild. FE was hugely successful in upsetting the TMO dominated raid scene, the first guild to do so in over a year at the time. I wouldn't expect longevity from a guild that had to play like FE and TMO 2.0 had to. Still did big things.

I'm not trying to be completely horrible when I say BDA was responsible for those 2 amazing guilds. Wouldn't have happened without you.

[Man0warr]

BDA isn't actively bigger than Taken or Rampage, we just don't boot inactive people, and the vast majority fall into that category.

[Anichek]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Versus measuring success with a huge in house army? EQ is a social game and working with other guilds to accomplish things is part of it, something our huge guilds in P99 usually forget. Yeah they do their thing and it works for them. So yes, very successful guild. FE was hugely successful in upsetting the TMO dominated raid scene, the first guild to do so in over a year at the time. I wouldn't expect longevity from a guild that had to play like FE and TMO 2.0 had to. Still did big things.

I'm not trying to be completely horrible when I say BDA was responsible for those 2 amazing guilds. Wouldn't have happened without you.

Cec - being social, what's wrong with us having a lot of people actually stick around in our guild?

The social aspect can be intra and inter guild.

[Cecily]

The game we play, it's all intra thanks to guild sizes. Large part of the reason guilds are so awful to each other when they do need to interact.

[Jfertal]

Originally Posted by Troubled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We're like water baby. We take up 2/3s of the server and we take the path of least resistance.

slayed it

[Stormfists]

Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Omni is fine I guess, if you measure your success by teaming up with two other guilds to kill stuff.

Bit harsh bro, given BDA roster exceeds that of those 3 guilds combined.

Fat girl calls other fat girl fat. Both fat.

[Man0warr]

BDA roster is inflated with inactives. You telling me those 3 guilds combined get less than 45 for raids? Because that's what we get on average.

[Llodd]

More yes, for sure, and mandatory raiding isnt a requirement /boggle; but why do so many BDA people go inactive ? sounds like you have a problem.

[Mead]

A lot of guilds have a policy that if you are on you must be raiding. This is nothing new. You join the guild knowing the policy. If you don't like it then that's not the place for you.

Also, this game is 16 years old, how do you expect people to not go inactive? I want to give you the benefit of the doubt and believe you're trolling, not mentally handicapped.