Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:21 PM
MalystryxVoF MalystryxVoF is offline
Aviak

MalystryxVoF's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 58
Default

no we did not receive any communications from Awa at all following that, only some tells from Aftermath along the lines of "did they really just drop that shit on you guys?"

so no, we did not. and eashen was not uncontested FYI. A/A might have conceded, but every other guild besides CSG was there as well trying to get it (with 1 small alliance whom also ended up conceding because they failed the pull and trained our CR'ing force again).
  #2  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:23 PM
Skew Skew is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 727
Default

Word to the wise.
Rooting dragons would cause untold petitionquest due to full scale wipes from trains.
The leapfrogging when Velious went live was HARDCORE.
Casuals wont get a single kill. And if A/A struggle to control trains and adds , you can bet CSG wont have a clue how to play leap frog without wiping 300 people. = 10,20,30,40,50 day bans and much petition quest.

Just implement C/R/FFA already and let A/A do their thing and you scrubs do yours.
  #3  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:30 PM
Legday Legday is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skew [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just implement C/R/FFA already and let A/A do their thing and you scrubs do yours.
The last thing that anybody wants is to wait for a casual guild to gather and kill a Class R Lady M so that Class C Vulak can die.
__________________
  #4  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:31 PM
Skew Skew is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The last thing that anybody wants is to wait for a casual guild to gather and kill a Class R Lady M so that Class C Vulak can die.
hmm good point. As you were.
  #5  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:40 PM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The last thing that anybody wants is to wait for a casual guild to gather and kill a Class R Lady M so that Class C Vulak can die.
Under such a system all of NTOV should be class C
  #6  
Old 03-01-2018, 05:50 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The last thing that anybody wants is to wait for a casual guild to gather and kill a Class R Lady M so that Class C Vulak can die.
You nerds wait all week +/- 8 hours for these dragons, what's another 8?
  #7  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:40 PM
Legday Legday is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's why you have Class R NToV as a whole. You know... as it's intended to be done.
See I doubt Class C would ever sign off on that. What you would have is an earthquake on day 1, regular respawns on day 8 (say its class R's turn), and generally casual attitude towards not bothering with overnight spawns, etc. would cause class C's turn on day 15 to be windows spread out across 2-3 days.
__________________
  #8  
Old 03-01-2018, 12:26 PM
Sonderbeast Sonderbeast is offline
Planar Protector

Sonderbeast's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,304
Default

Keep the incremental increase in ban time.

Fix the obvious bottleneck problem.
__________________
Draconite - 60 Warlord
Sond Cerulean - 58 Preserver



Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me [Rogean] or Nilbog.
  #9  
Old 03-01-2018, 01:06 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonderbeast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Keep the incremental increase in ban time.

Fix the obvious bottleneck problem.
It basically becomes a rotation once every guild but one is banned at any point in time!
  #10  
Old 03-01-2018, 01:12 PM
Sonderbeast Sonderbeast is offline
Planar Protector

Sonderbeast's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It basically becomes a rotation once every guild but one is banned at any point in time!
I think we found Baler's solution right here.
__________________
Draconite - 60 Warlord
Sond Cerulean - 58 Preserver



Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me [Rogean] or Nilbog.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.