Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

Until such time as DSM actually accepts the challenge and posts the results he has conceded.

To all my fellow trolls feel free to quote this post as your only reply (other than maybe entertaining GIFs)

Thread is over until then.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Until such time as DSM actually accepts the challenge and posts the results he has conceded.

To all my fellow trolls feel free to quote this post as your only reply (other than maybe entertaining GIFs)

Thread is over until then.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry, but you are not the overlord of this thread. So far my data is video evidence with logs that can be cross referenced to the video. https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638

Your data is a few screenshots of parse data you claim is inaccurate.

All of the other frequent posters haven't provided any evidence, and are basically trolling. You are also trolling

The thread is over until you can provide better evidence than what you have. Your current data doesn't match your own standards.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Until such time as DSM actually accepts the challenge and posts the results he has conceded.

To all my fellow trolls feel free to quote this post as your only reply (other than maybe entertaining GIFs)

Thread is over until then.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry, but you are not the overlord of this thread. So far my data is video evidence with logs that can be cross referenced to the video. https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638

Your data is a few screenshots of parse data you claim is inaccurate.

All of the other frequent posters haven't provided any evidence, and are basically trolling. You are also trolling

The thread is over until you can provide better evidence than what you have. Your current data doesn't match your own standards.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So far my data is evidence

... that you have not provided the relevant/requested data/evidence. This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your data is a few screenshots of parse data you claim is inaccurate.

No. You believing and/or claiming that something is true (such as that Troxx claims his data is inaccurate) does not make it true. It has to actually be true hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The thread and the posts within are self-evident if anyone wishes to see what Troxx has ACTUALLY claimed/explained about his data.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All of the other frequent posters haven't provided any evidence, and are basically trolling.

No. You believing and/or claiming that something is true (such as that other posters are trolling) does not make it true. It has to actually be true hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] The thread and the posts within are self-evident.


All I can do is re-state the facts in continued effort to attempt to continue the discussion(s) in a civil manner. The ball is in DSM's court.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as the data shows.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.

How's it going in that corner you've been backed into?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Until such time as DSM actually accepts the challenge and posts the results he has conceded.

I accepted his concession in advance in my very first post on this thread hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can only speak for myself, but your inevitable concession in silence for this thread is accepted in advance. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ooloo]

Has anyone provided data on which classes are most likely to be played well by their respective players?

An enchanter who sucks is not valuable. I'd like to think this is all purely data-driven and analytical, like min-maxers should prefer, but it also might just be a fruitless ego circle jerk!

[Troxx]

We kind of discussed at least insofar as how easy is to play a mage … even acutely after a stroke. You literally have nothing to do but send in your pet and sling nukes as often as mana allows

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Has anyone provided data on which classes are most likely to be played well by their respective players?

An enchanter who sucks is not valuable. I'd like to think this is all purely data-driven and analytical, like min-maxers should prefer, but it also might just be a fruitless ego circle jerk!

I did caveat in a few of my posts that the enchanter has to be good for anything I'm saying to be applicable. If you're an enc that uses animations in groups and barely does anything but mez and cast c2 then all bets are off.