Recent Events

[quido]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it has been CLEARLY set forth as a server rule that if you share info, you are responsible for the actions of anyone who logs into your account

their actions while on your account, not while on other accounts a year ago =P this is a new expectation

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no good excuse for not banning the accounts imo

it has been CLEARLY set forth as a server rule that if you share info, you are responsible for the actions of anyone who logs into your account

if 84 people were genuinely innocent (HIGHLY doubtful) but dumb enough to trust two exploiters, then 84 people sacrificed their accounts for froovy's sins

more likely, 2 prominent members without plausible deniability are taking the fall for an exploit that was rampant and well-known

the old lee Harvey Oswald trick

[Ehna Ne'Nah]

It's been two years since these guys shit on us without worrying about rules and other people.
Today, they try to make us believe that the involvement of 86 accounts in the same guild is an unfortunate incident and that nobody knew (after all it's christmas).

Not to mention the RMT ... It should be explained to me one day what you can buy in EQ with milions and millions plats ... but dollards ...

[heazels]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

their actions while on your account, not while on other accounts a year ago =P this is a new expectation

again i say, it is naive to think that 86 accounts were banned based on a minor event 1 year ago. Naive, like a little baby, that just became a blue person in the avatar movie

[quido]

http://wiki.project1999.com/index.ph...ed_Great_Staff

Going price is about 3 million.

[Barkingturtle]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

their actions while on your account, not while on other accounts a year ago =P this is a new expectation

On a free server, where the only identifying information is your account name and password, sharing your account with someone else effectively means it's just that: shared. It is no longer solely your account. It is both of yours. Should we not ban the accounts of cheaters? If a duper has 86 accounts, should we just ban one?

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

their actions while on your account, not while on other accounts a year ago =P this is a new expectation

any account that was logged on by the exploiting IP since they were first found to be exploiting should be banned

anything before should be irrelevant. simple enough.

whether or not they actually exploited from every account in question is immaterial. if i dupe 100 million plat on one account, but play 15 others, you're going to just ban the duping account while i go on my merry way?

newp

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Barkingturtle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On a free server, where the only identifying information is your account name and password, sharing your account with someone else effectively means it's just that: shared. It is no longer solely your account. It is both of yours. Should we not ban the accounts of cheaters? If a duper has 86 accounts, should we just ban one?

^ what he said

[Vaildez]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What's so difficult to understand? The exploits were committed by 2 people on a limited number of accounts. Nobody else knew about the exploits. These two people logged a lot of different people's accounts in their time in the guild, and now every account they've ever logged is suspended or banned despite never exploiting on most of these accounts. Some of the accounts were only logged by the offenders a single time.

2 people with access to 86 accounts exploiting and nobody else in TMO's know it....Yea fucking right..lol

[DrKvothe]

Has anyone confirmed that the exploits were not actually performed on the 84 other accounts, and that the exploiters just moved goods through these accounts?

That seems to be the version of the story that some here want us to believe, but that doesn't match the GM's announcement imo.