![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
how is it irrelevant? Did you see the date of the posting I linked?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
That code is nothing new. We do know how to get our hands on stuff too H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Thanks Haynar.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I think the 5% was added much later.
Otherwise you'd have many reports of Avatar of War's 1154 max hit being slightly lower on warriors outside defensive, which it wasn't.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Anyone try just asking Hobart yet that has a good enough relationship with him? I understand he has a pretty strong record of bro'ing down with people.
The thing is, even with that formula we'd be doing the same thing we are now... tweaking ac/atk to make it match. One thing is for sure though, it would probably fix the AC issues in PvP here if we did have it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I've posted about the 5% mitigation bonus before. It was in 2003 and was an additive bonus that coincided with bumping down defensive to a 45%. The net effect being a buff to non-discipline tanking while keeping discipline tanking the same.
If you're talking about skewing the distribution of DIs, you might be thinking about AAs here.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|