religion

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obvious lying fucking fraud is obvious

You got me. I'll spill, there's no such thing as a radical atheist. I know it's surprising to you and all but it's the truth.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't remember this scene (at this angle and with Riker doing this) Is this from outtakes?

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am going to explain evolution again for the creationist here. More than likely will regret this decision in 30 pages or so.

Creationist admit to small changes in a species. What they have trouble with is speciation. "A dog will always be and always has been a dog", they say.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With small changes over time you can end up with completely different species.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The individual symbols on this picture dont represent a single animal. They represent a species as time progresses. The amount of time between each snapshot is irrelevant for this explanation. Feel free to imagine a thousand millennia or a million years.

Creationist believe the blue symbol (pictured above) would produce the purple star symbol in a few short generations. The illustration above is a nice but it doesnt show the hundreds or thousand of generations with smaller changes BETWEEN each symbol. Each of these generations would be a small step closer to looking like the next symbol in the picture. This is micro-evolution in action and the sum total is called macro-evolution. The same exact mechanism is responsible for micro and macro.

Honestly, if I thought horses gave birth to squirrels or that blue symbols gave birth to purple stars then I wouldnt believe the shit either. That isnt what the theory claims though.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Goats don't grow from seeds. Colts don't grow from seeds. Worms... what does the bible say about worms, I don't even remember, maybe they grow from seeds... [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am going to explain evolution again for the creationist here. More than likely will regret this decision in 30 pages or so.

Creationist admit to small changes in a species. What they have trouble with is speciation. "A dog will always be and always has been a dog", they say.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With small changes over time you can end up with completely different species.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The individual symbols on this picture dont represent a single animal. They represent a species as time progresses. The amount of time between each snapshot is irrelevant for this explanation. Feel free to imagine a thousand millennia or a million years.

Creationist believe the blue symbol (pictured above) would produce the purple star symbol in a few short generations. The illustration above is a nice but it doesnt show the hundreds or thousand of generations with smaller changes BETWEEN each symbol. Each of these generations would be a small step closer to looking like the next symbol in the picture. This is micro-evolution in action and the sum total is called macro-evolution. The same exact mechanism is responsible for micro and macro.

Honestly, if I thought horses gave birth to squirrels or that blue symbols gave birth to purple stars then I wouldnt believe the shit either. That isnt what the theory claims though.

The response they come up with is going to be priceless though. I'm grabbing my popcorn.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The response they come up with is going to be priceless though. I'm grabbing my popcorn.

yeah lmao on this we agree, kaga.

[iruinedyourday]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqaD...4hW4zdfuBxMSJA

Damn.. I thought glass was super cooled liquid.. welp, science, you learn new things that you thought you knew every day!

you will not learn that creationism was correct after all though knuckle heads.

Although the value in religion I can see now. If I was the church I could just preach about how this guy is full of shit and glass is in fact what I grew up thinking it was cus I wanted it to be.

[G13]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You got me. I'll spill, there's no such thing as a radical atheist. I know it's surprising to you and all but it's the truth.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're a lying fucking fraud

Proven

[G13]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am going to explain evolution again for the creationist here. More than likely will regret this decision in 30 pages or so.

Creationist admit to small changes in a species. What they have trouble with is speciation. "A dog will always be and always has been a dog", they say.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With small changes over time you can end up with completely different species.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The individual symbols on this picture dont represent a single animal. They represent a species as time progresses. The amount of time between each snapshot is irrelevant for this explanation. Feel free to imagine a thousand millennia or a million years.

Creationist believe the blue symbol (pictured above) would produce the purple star symbol in a few short generations. The illustration above is a nice but it doesnt show the hundreds or thousand of generations with smaller changes BETWEEN each symbol. Each of these generations would be a small step closer to looking like the next symbol in the picture. This is micro-evolution in action and the sum total is called macro-evolution. The same exact mechanism is responsible for micro and macro.

Honestly, if I thought horses gave birth to squirrels or that blue symbols gave birth to purple stars then I wouldnt believe the shit either. That isnt what the theory claims though.

Hilarious

How did all life originate from one cell

It's not about a horse giving birth to a squirrel dipshit. You toss around these pathetic strawmen without a clue. It's comical and embarrassing. Animals cannot reproduce outside of their kinds.

You grasp this basic concept yes?

Please provide one example of one completely new and unique kind spontaneously coming into existence from another. Just give one example if you can. Completely new genetic code never before seen, chaotically and spontaneously sprouting into existence from either nothing or existing genetic code

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did all life originate from one cell

It's not about a horse giving birth to a squirrel dipshit. You toss around these pathetic strawmen without a clue. It's comical and embarrassing. Animals cannot reproduce outside of their kinds.

You grasp this basic concept yes?

Please provide one example of one completely new and unique kind spontaneously coming into existence from another. Just give one example if you can. Completely new genetic code never before seen, chaotically and spontaneously sprouting into existence from either nothing or existing genetic code

You can't argue against scientific study using psudo-scientific nonsense. I know that you don't get it but I'd feel bad if I didn't point that out anyway.