Father-in-law puts on Fox News

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm confused. I don't own a gun but believe in the right to own a gun, this is insincere why? Gun free zones don't work, this is demonstrably true.

If you're confused then you're ineffective.

[Fame]

Try limit my time spent with fox news viewers, I just find them in general to be less educated and more racist than one would normally expect from a human being growing up in the modern era.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you're confused then you're ineffective.

Context please. I'd like to know what I'm trying to affect.

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Try limit my time spent with fox news viewers, I just find them in general to be less educated and more racist than one would normally expect from a human being growing up in the modern era.

Eh, Iruinedyourday obviously doesn't watch the statement and he's the most racist poster on the forums.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Station* Fuck Swype. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Context please. I'd like to know what I'm trying to affect.

How would context help you with being or not being ineffective? Don't depend on it.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How would context help you with being or not being ineffective? Don't depend on it.

What effect? What are you implying that I'm trying to affect?

There needs to be an action taken for there to be a measure of effectiveness. What action are you referring to?

"Gun free zones don't work" Is this what you are referring to? I suggest you research what happened in Chicago after they re-instated concealed carry and tell me again how helpful banning guns was. I suggest you look into how many mass shootings have happened in gun-free zones compared to the number that took place elsewhere.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What effect? What are you implying that I'm trying to affect?

There needs to be an action taken for there to be a measure of effectiveness. What action are you referring to?

"Gun free zones don't work" Is this what you are referring to? I suggest you research what happened in Chicago after they re-instated concealed carry and tell me again how helpful banning guns was. I suggest you look into how many mass shootings have happened in gun-free zones compared to the number that took place elsewhere.

Your assumptions are tangential. Why are you assuming things when you're ineffective?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your assumptions are tangential. Why are you assuming things when you're ineffective?

Yeah I'm just gonna stop responding to you for a while.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah I'm just gonna stop responding to you for a while.

Disengagement is a condition of being ineffective.

[iruinedyourday]

Say what you will about the different news channels, liberal or conservative or whatever but...

To compare, CNN was found to have been honest about 60 percent of the time, while only having 18 percent of their comments found to be false. As for MSNBC, they were found to have been honest about 31 percent of the time, while 48 percent of the comments they had fact-checked were deemed untrue.

http://www.forwardprogressives.com/f...-percent-time/