Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:48 AM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Rogean came from a competitive raid scene server, he sets the rules, Sirken merely enforces his wishes. Rogean has no interest in a "first in force" rule set so he'd never decree it. The only work around to this would be if all the guilds got together and agreed on a rule set, however I don't see Rampage hamstringing their pixel intake unnecessarily for the good of the server.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #142  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:48 AM
JboxCSU JboxCSU is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanguru [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you can sit your X people at ToV entrance, claim Aaryonar, and afk + petition guilds getting FTE on him?
He's just laying the foundation, there would be holes to plug. I wouldn't be a fan of FiF in zone, but more of a proponent of FiF near the raid target, or a known/safe pull spot of the target.

Things like # of attempts, time to engage from claim, etc can be worked out.

Honestly FiF is the best idea I've seen...
  #143  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:50 AM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanguru [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you can sit your X people at ToV entrance, claim Aaryonar, and afk + petition guilds getting FTE on him?
TBH, I'm not sure how well First in Force would work in zones like sleepers and ToV, and I'm not sure how guilds normally divide NToV. Is it usually 1 guild takes all of NToV or do guilds leapfrog each other?

I'm fine with just saying that NToV + sleepers remain FTE.

If one pop of NToV is typically cleared by several guilds, then first in force would not make much sense to put in place. But if NToV is usually only raided by 1 guild at a time (guilds do not actively leapfrog each other), then FIF would work fine.

Yes. a guild could sit at IZ and claim NToV/Specific targets within NToV if necessary.
  #144  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:52 AM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rogean came from a competitive raid scene server, he sets the rules, Sirken merely enforces his wishes. Rogean has no interest in a "first in force" rule set so he'd never decree it. The only work around to this would be if all the guilds got together and agreed on a rule set, however I don't see Rampage hamstringing their pixel intake unnecessarily for the good of the server.
Totally. Hehe. I'm not coming in here and throwing my dick on the table so to speak. I'm just advocating for a rule that I think would work better for more guilds than FTE.
  #145  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:56 AM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

FYI - This thread was meant for non-Officer RnF enabled folks. Chest, please kindly take your bourgeoisie ass elsewhere.
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #146  
Old 10-22-2015, 09:58 AM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Sadly, Regular RnF is more reasonable than Officer RnF.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #147  
Old 10-22-2015, 10:02 AM
Rararboker Rararboker is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 728
Default

@maestrom= there is no division of ntov. Everyone scrambles to leapfrog or pull a mob first. It can be a md house. But until the last 2-3 weeks it has only been forsaken and rampage on 90% of the mobs. So trains were minimal and only happened occasionally. When they did, the responsble guild conceded on the mob.
  #148  
Old 10-22-2015, 10:06 AM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sadly, Regular RnF is more reasonable than Officer RnF.
While we have you, How does NToV usually get divied up? Aary's kind of a but because (correct me if I'm wrong) its not really possible to get to the other bosses in NToV without killing him.

So I'm imagining a situation where Filthy_Casual_Guild has gotten FIF and wants Aary only because they can't really handle the bigger baddies. If NToV is usually cleared by one guild, its fine to make Aary part of NToV completely and just say that NToV itself is a "target".

I imagine West and HoT are typically cleared by 1 guild, but if they're split up someone can correct me. So FIF would work just fine. 3 targets in ToV. North, West, and HoT. FIF gets its choice, next gets its choice, 3rd guild gets whatever is left.
  #149  
Old 10-22-2015, 10:08 AM
Fanguru Fanguru is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 199
Default

Every guild who can muster a 50+ people force can kill Aaryonar in NToV, especially with the alliances.
Once Aary is dead, most dragons in NToV are easier.
We had huge train issues because 5 guilds were competing for NToV mobs and there aren't 5 safe spots.

After Aary, there is leapfrogging all over the place.
The slimiest tactic used so far (afaik) was aggroing Vulaak (ie: all nameds are summoned to him) after another guild killed Kreizen's guards and picking Kreizen off when he was pathing back.
  #150  
Old 10-22-2015, 10:10 AM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rararboker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
@maestrom= there is no division of ntov. Everyone scrambles to leapfrog or pull a mob first. It can be a md house. But until the last 2-3 weeks it has only been forsaken and rampage on 90% of the mobs. So trains were minimal and only happened occasionally. When they did, the responsble guild conceded on the mob.
If this is the case, its probably best to leave NToV and Sleepers as FTE. I think that, generally, FIF is a better system, but it would be easy to imagine a situation where Guild A claims Aary and then sits there until 4am before engaging.

I am NOT a fan of time limits on engage/wipes. The point of FIF is to encourage guilds that don't want to participate in the FTE grieffest to get to raiding. to put FIF in place and then to give them only 1 shot at a target or to say that they only have 20 minutes to execute their plan would be a little unfair.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.