Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Exp loss on PvP death?
Yes. Keep it. 28 30.43%
No. Remove it. 44 47.83%
Fuck you. 20 21.74%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:09 AM
Etris Etris is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 215
Default

Also you guys should take out "Encumberance" in the game and make all items stackable.

Just sayin.
  #152  
Old 08-07-2012, 05:54 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Heres my process, each time i die (Hint: if youre in a zone where pvp is happening alot, which i saw a few times FF vs Nihilum, you will do this as a shaman a couple of times within 30 minutes):

- Med up, while im doing that:

- Load up all my buffing spells

- buff up

- remove all buffing spells

- Load up my pvp set of spells

- med some more

- If im with pvp buddies, gonna have to buff em too after running to the regroup point.

- Med some more

- Run to wherever i died

- Loot my corpse

So to everyone saying that pvp death needs to sting, thats a penalty enough for me. Im already looking at other games (DayZ) to get my pvp fix. I would put my hand in the fire that its because xp pvp death with all the xp and medding hassles combined is why we saw so little of pvp happen compared to what happened on Rallos.

Just playing for a few days reminds me of the pvp process of EQ in general and on this box. XP loss really needs to go. We dont need this on top of the rest of the hassle of dying.

Im willing to take all this, but with xp loss on top, since im really not a PVEer and dont get the option to put PVE on hold indefinitely while i PVP, the bad outweights the good.

Example: On rallos i had a couple of toons which i used strictly for pvping, like a lvl 12 wizard. Here its impossible to have that, just have an alt to jump in for some pvp fun for a couple of hours, without the need to PVE to keep him there.

One more time: Example: On rallos i had a couple of toons which i used strictly for pvping, like a lvl 12 wizard. Here its impossible to have that, just have an alt to jump in for some pvp fun for a couple of hours, without the need to PVE to keep him there.


Blah blah blah cant take EQ. Youre right, cant take EQ like this, boring. XP loss in pvp is bad from so many angles
Last edited by Tradesonred; 08-07-2012 at 07:52 PM..
  #153  
Old 08-07-2012, 06:09 PM
Cars Cars is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tradesonred [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Heres my process, each time i die (Hint: if youre in a zone where pvp is happening alot, which i saw a few times FF vs Nihilum, you will do this as a shaman a couple of times within 30 minutes):

- Med up, while im doing that:

- Load up all my buffing spells

- buff up

- remove all buffing spells

- Load up my pvp set of spells

- med some more

- Run to wherever i died

- Loot my corpse

So to everyone saying that pvp death needs to sting, thats a penalty enough for me. Im already looking at other games (DayZ) to get my pvp fix. I would put my hand in the fire that its because xp pvp death with all the xp and medding hassles combined is why we saw so little of pvp happen compared to what happened on Rallos.

Just playing for a few days reminds me of the pvp process of EQ in general and on this box. XP loss really needs to go. We dont need this on top of the rest of the hassle of dying.

Blah blah blah cant take EQ. Youre right, cant take EQ like this, boring.
Even though I originally said I was for exp loss, I am now definitely against it. I still don't think that item loot should be a part of the game though. imo the two topics shouldn't be treated as mutually exclusive in any argument
__________________
__________________________________

Carsomyr - 55 Pally - Retired
Thalon - 49 Rogue - Temporarily Benched
Contagious - Necro - 30's and climbing
Lights - 55 Wiz - Occasional Murderer
  #154  
Old 08-08-2012, 06:28 AM
xblade724 xblade724 is offline
Fire Giant

xblade724's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 638
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseBanned [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
xp loss upon pvp death was classic (sz), in fact I remember it being more but maybe thats because I was a newb back then.
Scrub, pvp loss was NEVER classic on ANY pvp server. Sullon was also the last pvp server to come out and makes the word classic non-existent. Plus, Rallos was the most hardcore server and even that wasn't xp loss.

"QQ if they remove the xp then..thenn... then i'll be bind rushed!!" WTF if a naked caster of any kind has time to get full mana, mem his spells and still kill you naked and haven't left the area, you deserve to die. "BUT THE MONKS!" oh yea, 0.2% of the population .. get over it.

We are worried about bind rush, but what happens more often than bind rushing is chain pvp deaths/trolls. You think bind rushing, the rare occurrence, is worse? WTB logic

>> Edit: Someone else said something about investing time in xp is the same as investing xp in coin. Try saying that to the people with MASSIVE hybrid xp penalties O_o Coin is special for loot because you can keep gathering it, and depending on how risky/greedy you want to be you can risk getting more before banking it. That's your loss if you stayed and was greedy/lazy. Xp loss is whether you are playing smart or not -- not cool, especially on super repeat/chain ganks.

>> Furthermore, this prevents chain ganks/corpse camping on the same individual!! No reward = they move on. Killing a naked guy trying to recover his corpse resulting in xp loss is satisfying and will encourage this as it happens all the time with no GM reinforcement (that i've ever experienced or heard anyone experience)
__________________
Last edited by xblade724; 08-08-2012 at 06:36 AM..
  #155  
Old 08-09-2012, 02:49 PM
Greegon Greegon is offline
Planar Protector

Greegon's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: windy city
Posts: 1,068
Default

XP loss is cool in classic, but kunark xp rates with xp loss=insanity
__________________
snake nipsskin 60 dru
  #156  
Old 08-09-2012, 03:01 PM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greegon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
XP loss is cool in classic, but kunark xp rates with xp loss=insanity
Nailed it.
__________________
  #157  
Old 08-09-2012, 03:03 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xblade724 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Scrub, pvp loss was NEVER classic on ANY pvp server. Sullon was also the last pvp server to come out and makes the word classic non-existent. Plus, Rallos was the most hardcore server and even that wasn't xp loss.

"QQ if they remove the xp then..thenn... then i'll be bind rushed!!" WTF if a naked caster of any kind has time to get full mana, mem his spells and still kill you naked and haven't left the area, you deserve to die. "BUT THE MONKS!" oh yea, 0.2% of the population .. get over it.

We are worried about bind rush, but what happens more often than bind rushing is chain pvp deaths/trolls. You think bind rushing, the rare occurrence, is worse? WTB logic

>> Edit: Someone else said something about investing time in xp is the same as investing xp in coin. Try saying that to the people with MASSIVE hybrid xp penalties O_o Coin is special for loot because you can keep gathering it, and depending on how risky/greedy you want to be you can risk getting more before banking it. That's your loss if you stayed and was greedy/lazy. Xp loss is whether you are playing smart or not -- not cool, especially on super repeat/chain ganks.

>> Furthermore, this prevents chain ganks/corpse camping on the same individual!! No reward = they move on. Killing a naked guy trying to recover his corpse resulting in xp loss is satisfying and will encourage this as it happens all the time with no GM reinforcement (that i've ever experienced or heard anyone experience)
Fairly certain there was xp loss on a pvp death on SZ. Never seen you in game so I am going to assume you play blue and just browse the red forums. RZ most hard core? lol 4 level pvp range sounds like childs play when compared to no rules no level range on SZ. also you whining about being bind camped/corpse camped its pretty funny. RZ must have been a nice place if you could get GMs to help you.
Last edited by SamwiseBanned; 08-09-2012 at 03:06 PM..
  #158  
Old 08-09-2012, 03:08 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

Flowers of Happiness had rules posted on notacult, here is a forum post read line 3

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=39541

3. Characters will lose experience when killed in PvP combat if the character that killed them is within 5 levels. The amount of experience lost will be the same amount that is lost if that character is killed by an NPC. Your corpse can be resurrected by a cleric to partially restore lost experience.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #159  
Old 08-09-2012, 07:10 PM
Nizzarr Nizzarr is offline
Planar Protector

Nizzarr's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,644
Default

thats sz ruleset.

Worked good.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.