Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We still have yet to see you join a fast paced group with your dog pet and log any modicum of respectable sustained dps on your shaman.

It’s sad you were too chicken-liver’d to try as hard in game as you blow-hard in this thread. I know you won’t and I’m pretty sure I know why: you will get data that doesn’t fit your narrative and would effectively prove yourself wrong.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We still have yet to see you join a fast paced group with your dog pet and log any modicum of respectable sustained dps on your shaman.

It’s sad you were too chicken-liver’d to try as hard in game as you blow-hard in this thread. I know you won’t and I’m pretty sure I know why: you will get data that doesn’t fit your narrative and would effectively prove yourself wrong.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We still have yet to see you join a fast paced group with your dog pet and log any modicum of respectable sustained dps on your shaman.

It’s sad you were too chicken-liver’d to try as hard in game as you blow-hard in this thread. I know you won’t and I’m pretty sure I know why: you will get data that doesn’t fit your narrative and would effectively prove yourself wrong.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ripqozko]

hes about to post his post again to fit his narrative then say, you gotta prove it

[Ripqozko]

UCF +DSM had to be the worst combo of guildies ever, the data proves it.

[Troxx]

DSM you can’t even appropriately interpret the data you’ve been given. The only “data” you provided was you solo root dotting a lv 40 jin frog and then you solo root dotting one zone in golem. Beyond that it’s broken napkin math.

You have provided precisely zero actual real life data/evidence of how much damage your shaman could do in a fast killing group competing with the relative dps of 2 hasted quadding enchanter pets.

I gave you real life samplings of myself with a tunare equipped monk, a raid geared sk, an epic mage and at times we had it a charmed enchanter pet all competing for finite damage per mob before it was dead. In some cases we had mobs dead before you could realistically land your third ice strike if chain cast as soon as tank engaged.

Mage pets are strong dps. I doubt you would be able to sustainably keep up with just the pet nevermind my own nukes.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM you can’t even appropriately interpret the data you’ve been given. The only “data” you provided was you solo root dotting a lv 40 jin frog and then you solo root dotting one zone in golem. Beyond that it’s broken napkin math.

You have provided precisely zero actual real life data/evidence of how much damage your shaman could do in a fast killing group competing with the relative dps of 2 hasted quadding enchanter pets.

I gave you real life samplings of myself with a tunare equipped monk, a raid geared sk, an epic mage and at times we had it a charmed enchanter pet all competing for finite damage per mob before it was dead. In some cases we had mobs dead before you could realistically land your third ice strike if chain cast as soon as tank engaged.

Mage pets are strong dps. I doubt you would be able to sustainably keep up with just the pet nevermind my own nukes.

It is up to you to prove DPS somehow changes in a group. It doesn't. A mob with 8000 HP you solo is still going to have 8000 HP in a group. Why do you think the math is going to change? You have never given an answer to this question.

If your group is killing mobs on an average of 36 seconds, you can easily determine how many nukes you can cast per encounter, and average DPS of pets.

My data is video evidence with logs you can cross reference. Your data is screenshots of a parser you keep claiming isn't correct for some reason.

[Troxx]

20 more pages to go!

[DeathsSilkyMist]

You need to provide better data first. But you won't, because you know it will just show the same math I have been providing.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You need to provide better data first. But you won't, because you know it will just show the same math I have been providing.

called it