Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:37 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
called it
Precisely. You are quite perceptive. Video evidence with logs you can cross reference are superior to screenshots from a parser we can't prove is working correctly, since Troxx says it isn't.

He needs to provide better evidence first. But he clearly won't based on his 200+ troll posts. He doesn't want to be the one to admit he is wrong.

He will just keep claiming my data is skewed, because that is easier lol. Unfortunately for him anybody can look at the videos I provided, cross reference them to the logs, and parse the data themselves. My data is undeniable, while his could easily be wrong.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-06-2022 at 02:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:37 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Indeed you did lol.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:44 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 681
Default

Now, I haven't looked at the maths here, but I am intelligent enough to realise:

If a mob is often dying so quick that a nuke won't be worth casting, doesn't it stand to reason that a mage pet completely outclasses both the shaman pet, and everything else he can do?

It's checkmate. Just shut up already, DSM. Troxx didn't even need to post any data, because anyone with common sense can figure this out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:45 PM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now, I haven't looked at the maths here, but I am intelligent enough to realise:

If a mob is often dying so quick that a nuke won't be worth casting, doesn't it stand to reason that a mage pet completely outclasses both the shaman pet, and everything else he can do?

It's checkmate. Just shut up already, DSM. Troxx didn't even need to post any data, because anyone with common sense can figure this out.
NO COMMON SENSE ALLOWED. PLEASE POST FAULTY DATA AND MATH SO DSM CAN DO MENTAL GYMNASTICS TO PROVE HOW HE'S STILL RIGHT!
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:48 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now, I haven't looked at the maths here, but I am intelligent enough to realise:

If a mob is often dying so quick that a nuke won't be worth casting, doesn't it stand to reason that a mage pet completely outclasses both the shaman pet, and everything else he can do?

It's checkmate. Just shut up already, DSM. Troxx didn't even need to post any data, because anyone with common sense can figure this out.
If a mob is dying in 5 seconds, that means your group is dealing 1600 DPS (somehow). 48 DPS from a pet isn't going to make any noticeable difference lol. It's a difference of 0.16 seconds. So no, a Mage is literally useless in that situation too.

It's the same issue if you mean mobs are dying in 10 seconds. That means your group is doing 800 DPS, and the difference between 800 DPS and 750 DPS on a mob with 8000 HP is 0.66 seconds.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:49 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My parse pulled right out of DSMs stupidly long post.

This is one of my favorites for showcasing a lazy mage by the way. It’s a one nuke fight where the mage out-dps’d everyone including the chanter charm. Other epic mage was slow on the draw sending in his pet. I can’t comment on whether he nukes more than once. If he did he beat me but yeah … one nuke fight with a scaled dps of 111 combined mage + pet not counting in DS.

1 825dd nuke, 4 pet procs (lucky string but I’ll take it … though he missed all of his backstab attempts so it evens out) combined damage of 2313 damage (ench pet did 2188).

With 2 charmed and torched enchanter pets this is about how long you can expect a fight to last lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:52 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My parse pulled right out of DSMs stupidly long post.

This is one of my favorites for showcasing a lazy mage by the way. It’s a one nuke fight where the mage out-dps’d everyone including the chanter charm. Other epic mage was slow on the draw sending in his pet. I can’t comment on whether he nukes more than once. If he did he beat me but yeah … one nuke fight with a scaled dps of 111 combined mage + pet not counting in DS.

1 825dd nuke, 4 pet procs (lucky string but I’ll take it) combined damage of 2313 damage (ench pet did 2188).

With 2 charmed and torched enchanter pets this is about how long you can expect a fight to last lol
Again, on a single parse a Shaman can do higher DPS too. This encounter is 21 seconds, so a Shaman could do 2x Ice Strikes and a Winter's Roar in 21 seconds.

That is ((675 x 2) + 263 / 21) = 76 DPS. With pet that is a total of 94 DPS.

The math really isn't hard here. The difference is only 25 DPS in that case, and you are not averaging 4 procs per encounter, so the number is lower on average.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:56 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, on a single parse a Shaman can do higher DPS too. This encounter is 21 seconds, so a Shaman could do 2x Ice Strikes and a Winter's Roar in 21 seconds.

That is ((675 x 2) + 263 / 21) = 76 DPS. With pet that is a total of 94 DPS.

The math really isn't hard here. The difference is only 25 DPS in that case, and you are not averaging 4 procs per encounter, so the number is lower on average.
Cool I could have lobbed 3x 825 nukes … except it would have been dead before I could land the third at a 6 second cast cause it would have been dead in under 15 seconds.

825 x 2 divided by 15 = 110dps plus my 56 dps mage is 166 dps.

If it did live 18 seconds that’s 825 x3 divided by 18 = 137.5 dps plus my 56dps pet = 193.5 dps.

See? I can napkin math too!

This is why napkin math sucks. Real gameplay doesn’t work out that way. Can you chain nuke? Yep. But you’re going to run your mana dry or spend more time casting cannibalize and torporing yourself than nuking. Your functional/actual dps will be garbage over the long haul unless there’s a lot of down time. If there’s a lot of down time for you, there would be for the mage as well and downtime favors the mage more than the shaman.

We have already established mages can lay down serious damage if not constrained by mana. Far superior to what a shaman can manage.

This is why we have more or less begged you to get out there in a fast paced group and prove it.

But you won’t.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Last edited by Troxx; 09-06-2022 at 03:01 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:54 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,003
Default

DSM has basically been saying, no you, for 180 pages.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2022, 02:55 PM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DSM has basically been saying, no you, for 180 pages.
/thread

Napkin math perfectly matches real life situations at all times right guys? Raise your hand if you've ever been in a group where a shaman has done anywhere near a mage's dps. I'll wait. DSM's hand doesn't count.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.