Here's your chance to influence LnS

[mostbitter]

If I have someone on ignore because they are truly repugnant and obnoxious how can I tell if they are asking for loot and scoot or bind rushing ?

[bigshowtime]

ok, i have a serious question about the LNS here.

90% of the time, i play with ooc off, because it is usually just disgusting to have to read and i am pretty offended by the crap people say in it... am i forced to now play with ooc on to know if the player is requesting LNS in small pvp situations?

also, the same applies to the ignore feature. i have a few people on this server on ignore, because of the same reason above (the habitual offenders), will i need to take these players off ignore to know they are requesting LNS ?

thanks.
showtime

[Derubael]

Originally Posted by AmukTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just to clarify between large scale and small scale pvp..only one side has to consist of 7 or more correct?

i.e. 2 groups are doing fear and 1 group comes in to pvp. This falls into large scale rules where lns is always applied?

Correct.

Originally Posted by AmukTZ

Overall I think this is laid out clearly and not too many gray areas exist. When does this go into action?

For right now it's just on the drawing board. I mostly posted this for feedback to wipe out as much gray area as possible, so I'm still putting out the challenge for people to think of a situation where this could be abused, misinterpreted, or lawyered so I can fix it if needed.

Originally Posted by mostbitter

If I have someone on ignore because they are truly repugnant and obnoxious how can I tell if they are asking for loot and scoot or bind rushing ?

You'll still see the YT. Ask someone else in zone, or take them off ignore for a minute and ask them. Someone running naked through a zone is a good indication that they might be LnS'ing.

Originally Posted by bigshowtime

ok, i have a serious question about the LNS here.

90% of the time, i play with ooc off, because it is usually just disgusting to have to read and i am pretty offended by the crap people say in it... am i forced to now play with ooc on to know if the player is requesting LNS in small pvp situations?

also, the same applies to the ignore feature. i have a few people on this server on ignore, because of the same reason above (the habitual offenders), will i need to take these players off ignore to know they are requesting LNS ?

They have to call it in either /shout or /ooc. If you have ooc turned off, you'll still be able to see the YT, so if you see a YT on a player and then see them in your zone, you may want to ask them if they are LnSing so you don't kill them on a LnS.

[iiNGloriouS]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 10.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

only people punished under pnp, wore <nihilum> tag. that's why, true or not.

But as I recall it was on day 2 of the rules being established, and each member killed several people who were naked (I'd say 3+ each). But both players have also been banned in the past and to my understanding as of now, have given the GMs extreme attitudes.

[Bazia]

Ender and Tune both have been banned before, how many chances should someone get.

[bigshowtime]

ok derubael, that sounds fair i will make sure to ask in /shout or tells...

what about if a player is calling for LNS, and then taunts you? like many times i have seen people on a CR sit there and say things like "i dare you to attack me" or something of the sort, are they forfeiting there safety and protection because of this? or are they allowed to say whatever they want knowing we can't hit back?

Thanks.
showtime

[Smedy]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ender and Tune both have been banned before, how many chances should someone get.

i say none, if gms want to be respected they need to stand their ground and ride the wave of posts from mads and sads, maybe then people will respect the pnp rules

[Dullah]

Except neither of my bans should have been bans according to rules and common sense. One for deleting char of player known for deleting and stealing accounts/characters/gear + RMT without any repercussions.

Originally Posted by Sirken

deleting chars he has info to isnt technically against the rules. players are responsible for their own acct info

One for killing a player in mass pvp among 30 other players that remained in zone when they should have been gone according to LNS.

Keep rewriting the rules though, the GMs will lead you to victory.

[COLGATETHEGRANDMASTER]

Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except neither of my bans should have been bans according to rules and common sense. One for deleting char of player known for deleting and stealing accounts/characters/gear without any repercussions.



One for killing a player in mass pvp among 30 other players that remained in zone when they should have been gone according to LNS.

putting sirken's name in a quote doesn't mean that it was actually said, nor does it mean it was posted before the rules changed

you broke the rules, you got the punishment you deserve

SCUM

[Bazia]

Who did mellow delete and strip?