Impeaching President Trump

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stop being so sensitive, snowflake, and address the Associated Press article. You and Teppler are always the victim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On your AP article. I don't care about when the portrait was hung. You are taking advice of when the portrait arrived from when other offices received it and no discussion of when she didn't hang it. It might of arrived late but she claims she hung it after that. Did she? You are blindly trusting someones word that is openly speaking out against the President. You now need to proceed with caution. You just already eat up anything fed to you.

The second piece was how Trump had the claim that we need to stop funding Ukraine and why are we always the sucker? If you weren't an idiot and actually read the article it said our administration is just paying 400 million for this aid package. That did not include money from NATO. It said overall the EU has donated 16 billion. NATO organizations donate more. Guess who the top donator of NATO is? The United States by a VERY large margin.

You article is terribly written and doesn't understand that we not only send aid through the administration but through NATO funding as well as the top donator.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/674578...-target-trump/

"The United States contributes the most to the alliance, funding around 70 per cent of Nato spending.

This adds up to roughly £501billion, or two thirds of total spending on national budgets."

[Hazek]

"America first"

HA HA JAY KAY

[Valeriya]

Trumps going to win

[BallzDeep]

The point he is making is that we hold funds all the time while we working with countries for political decisions. If a certain country isn't upholding to the nations standards, it is common place to hold money while you investigate the issue or work on reform. This was even a thing with Venezuela not long again. If NATO was taking advantage of money, you hold the money while you investigate. The democrats are just upset that he was asking to investigate one of their own and consider that abusing power to have political influence in the elections. The democrats are already guilty of that, look at the celebrities they utilize to try and reach millions. The media companies they utilize to push the same talking points. It's a pretty even field if you ask me and if Trump is looking into how far the DNC is corrupt, he should be able to within the realm of not uttering the words that would violate law. He needs to threaten and then hold. You never got the threat. Quid Pro Quo in law refers to "A contract must involve consideration: that is, the exchange of something of value for something else of value."

There was never a verbal, written or any form of agreement.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point he is making is that we hold funds all the time while we working with countries for political decisions. If a certain country isn't upholding to the nations standards, it is common place to hold money while you investigate the issue or work on reform. This was even a thing with Venezuela not long again. If NATO was taking advantage of money, you hold the money while you investigate.

Withholding congressionally approved aid in order to dig up dirt on your political rival is hardly something that is commonplace.

[Valeriya]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Withholding congressionally approved aid in order to dig up dirt on your political rival is hardly something that is commonplace.

Oh boy here comes Horza the Hillary Clinton of p99

[Valeriya]

'

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Valeriya [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh boy here comes Horza the Hillary Clinton of p99

You're going to have to be funnier than that if you want to be signature-worthy.

[Valeriya]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're going to have to be funnier than that if you want to be signature-worthy.

Quit crying Hillary

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Withholding congressionally approved aid in order to dig up dirt on your political rival is hardly something that is commonplace.

So it isn't commonplace to investigate when a crime is possibly committed, got it. That's an issue with your whole phrase. "Dig up dirt." He shouldn't have dirt. I'd argue Trump has been extensively vetted and more so then Biden. If the biggest dirt you have on Trump is hes looking into dirt on Biden that could possibly be true, it's just that fact you don't like he's looking into dirt and possible corruption. "Dirt" as you so put it, should be looked into.