the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[robayon]

Well, I don't either, but given that the sleazeball who sponsored the bill explicitly said that there is no minimum age for marriage in that article, I suspect he meant that it would void the above requirements if passed when his comment is taken in context

I would love to hear the takes of the conservative "totally not just bigots" crowd who support the Don't Say Gay bill because their rationale for their support was that they are protecting children

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, I don't either, but given that the sleazeball who sponsored the bill explicitly said that there is no minimum age for marriage in that article, I suspect he meant that it would void the above requirements if passed when his comment is taken in context

I would love to hear the takes of the conservative "totally not just bigots" crowd who support the Don't Say Gay bill because their rationale for their support was that they are protecting children

Does the bill amend § 36-3-105 ? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Does the bill amend § 36-3-105 ? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know I just feel like leatherwood would have said "the age requirements will remain in place" if it didn't and not "there is no age requirement" or whatever he said in the article

[starkind]

The USA fed is a fairly Astanic organization. They got their logos plastered everywhere.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The USA fed is a fairly Astanic organization. They got their logos plastered everywhere.

My brother is pretty into Warhammer 40k

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know I just feel like leatherwood would have said "the age requirements will remain in place" if it didn't and not "there is no age requirement" or whatever he said in the article

I think the bill speaks for itself, you persnickety twerp.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the bill speaks for itself, you persnickety twerp.

Told you you should just say what you mean, this whole discussion need never happen

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Told you you should just say what you mean, this whole discussion need never happen

I think if I did that you would complain about what I didn't say and treat me badly for it.

[Patriam1066]

Pokesan the years haven’t been kind to you my old friend. You’re now pro Russia and child marriage? SAD BIGLY!

Is this because Russell Wilson left Seattle ?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pokesan the years haven’t been kind to you my old friend. You’re now pro Russia and child marriage? SAD BIGLY!

Is this because Russell Wilson left Seattle ?

The bill doesn't change it from 17+ with parental consent(18 without) or the +4 limit even with parental consent.