Noble Dojorn Timers

[Ella`Ella]

TMO stands by its former agreement and will agree to continue to not engage Overseers.

[bktroost]

Unbrella, can you comment on a GM enforced suspension for killing OOAs? This is an addition to the original agreement. As this would only behoove you should your competition go nuclear again, I can't see why this should cause any problems for TMO.

[-Catherin-]

OoA was apparently killed again btw.

Since IB hasn't commented on this thread I am assuming its them again until they state otherwise.

[-Catherin-]

IB claiming it wasn't them. so /shrug. regardless this isn't working now.

Does anyone have an idea of who did it?

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by bktroost [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Unbrella, can you comment on a GM enforced suspension for killing OOAs? This is an addition to the original agreement. As this would only behoove you should your competition go nuclear again, I can't see why this should cause any problems for TMO.

TMO will endorse a GM enforcement on not engaging OoA.

[bktroost]

Well I think every guild is going about killing the OOAs because nothing is set in stone or enforced. Seems we will have a unanimous agreement on these OOAs that is enforced if we can get an IB officer to sign on.

[Hokushin]

We would like to see the nobles rotated OR only killed by the guild who has sky that day, without OOAs being killed.. with all guilds agreeing

[jpetrick]

Indignation agrees to rotate nobles amongst guilds. We are against your day your noble due to guilds sharing a sky day creating complications for a different system.

[Hyjal]

Dojo is contesting in Sky and believe Noble and OOR are fair game. In full disagreement with any GM enforced rotation.


Just like the flawed Sky schedule. The noble schedule will be flawed. Nobody wants to wait and see who gets to cherry pick or play an instanced version of EQ. Please stop with all the rotations.

[bktroost]

Hyjal, Elzhi and Hokushin, we are not discussing a GM enforced noble rotation. We are purely discussing a GM enforced hands off on OOAs.

Would I like to see a system like YNYD once the OOAs are up and running? Absolutely! But the one thing every guild can agree on right now is that the OOAs staying alive benefit the server.

Please speak to that topic as to whether you agree to a GM enforced OOA protected server.