Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 02-24-2015, 03:38 PM
ClownGuild ClownGuild is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because looking at past IP logins is soooo difficult. I fully expect your alt army to show up just to spit in the face of the suspension.
Don't worry I'll talk Asgard into throwing you the typical SW and Xygoz bone we have been.
  #172  
Old 02-24-2015, 03:49 PM
wycca wycca is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 371
Default

Consistency in rule violations is certainly a problem. Really need to approach it like judiciary rulings than off-the-cuff changes-week-to-week. Really frustrating.

AT breaks bag limit = 2 week raid suspension
TMO violates by 27sec = 1 week raid suspension
IB breaks bag limit = no punishment

Anyone else troubled by the new Gore ruling? Anytime you accidentally get FTE on a mob (even if its immediately dropped) you get a punishment. Certainly going to make moving through Dreadlands more interesting when Gore is up.

Precedents are set and changed from week to week. That's the main problem.
__________________
First - Monsters & Memories

Argenti | Cobblestone | Animan
  #173  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:01 PM
Pint Pint is offline
Planar Protector

Pint's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Plane of Hate
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Anyone else troubled by the new Gore ruling? Anytime you accidentally get FTE on a mob (even if its immediately dropped) you get a punishment. Certainly going to make moving through Dreadlands more interesting when Gore is up.
We (asgard) actually had a 60 sk log into the lair on naggy spawn thinking he was going to get to watch the fight and end up with the fte and lair boot, thats kind of the same thing. I'm not sure tmo or ib bothered petitioning it but we certainly want to earn our class C stripes with our first raid suspension so feel free to submit a case.
__________________
Pint
  #174  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:04 PM
kurtis kurtis is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClownGuild [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Don't worry I'll talk Asgard into throwing you the typical SW and Xygoz bone we have been.
You're so cute. Props to Talsabis, Nalken, and that other ranger for doing work lately. Not sure what y'all's other 22 pad sockers are doing on their run up.
  #175  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:06 PM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,490
Default

Accidental FTEs shouldn't be considered a violation if they don't result in a pull attempt. Like that Gore we forfeited. And that rogue wasn't a tracker or a puller. Dumb. It's just dumb.
  #176  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:08 PM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

I thought we agreed not to park trackers on mob spawns anymore regardless of faction.
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #177  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:08 PM
cs616 cs616 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Instead of training mobs and pulling to the zone in (which I remember TMO arguing as raid interference when BDA pulled Inny to the zone in, claiming they were preventing any other guild from zoning in) why don't guilds instead kill the raid mobs that they want moved out of the way and then progress through the zone?
Because that would be considered a rule infraction and result in the guild who did it being suspended. I seriously don't know how many times/ways I need to explain this.
  #178  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:13 PM
ClownGuild ClownGuild is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're so cute. Props to Talsabis, Nalken, and that other ranger for doing work lately. Not sure what y'all's other 22 pad sockers are doing on their run up.
You're also forgetting Detoxx getting 2 Nexona's, A PD, 2 Xygozs.

You are forgetting Gunterr and his multiple FTEs

Nixxar

Barlow

The list goes on.

In TMO we don't depend on one or 2 people while the rest sit with thumbs up their butt. We have skilled players across the board. It kinda shows with your guild too. One player disappears and your productivity drops 75%.
  #179  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:16 PM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because that would be considered a rule infraction and result in the guild who did it being suspended. I seriously don't know how many times/ways I need to explain this.
So it's a rule that you can't kill mobs on their spawn point???
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #180  
Old 02-24-2015, 04:23 PM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

this is just a conspiracy to prevent asgard from getting Class C mobs on rumbles
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.