Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: Most Dominant Guild Ever
Aftermath 18 4.17%
Awakened 32 7.41%
Inglourious Basterds 55 12.73%
The Mystical Order 174 40.28%
Rampage 85 19.68%
Forsaken 3 0.69%
other 65 15.05%
Voters: 432. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:29 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Anyone remember the ridiculous 15-man rule and the lawyerquesting over it?
First to 15 coupled with too much gm intervention = broken raid scene.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #172  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:35 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

So far the only ruleset that hasn't resulted in a fucktarded amount of work for the GMs is non-CSR train wars.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #173  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:37 PM
getsome getsome is offline
Fire Giant

getsome's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Anyone remember the ridiculous 15-man rule and the lawyerquesting over it?
We got a nice Donals BP from that rule.
  #174  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:39 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Yeah it seemed though that anytime someone tried to get the GMs to enforce the fact that a group dropped below 15 they would say "don't lawyerquest."
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #175  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:40 PM
getsome getsome is offline
Fire Giant

getsome's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So far the only ruleset that hasn't resulted in a fucktarded amount of work for the GMs is non-CSR train wars.
Non CSR was a farce.

Eyes got banned during our summer of 2012 love fest.

Rogean warned IB with a ban if we looted a TMO kill after killing anyone who could loot it.
  #176  
Old 07-05-2016, 04:43 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayso [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yep. The fact that TMO 2.0 is still so despised by so many that they would vote anything else is further proof of that dominance, really. A spite vote against TMO is actually a vote for TMO, which means TMO is currently winning 338 to zero.
I'm in BDA on Phinny... and not a day goes by that TMO isn't mentioned in some form in guild chat. IN THEIR HEADS.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #177  
Old 07-05-2016, 05:12 PM
Arteker Arteker is offline
Fire Giant

Arteker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sorry peeps but how did TMO win this? All they did was pick up the pieces after IB/TR got bored and quit. Then they had a glorious gravy train of uncontested pixels for their zerg.

That's not influential. They just road the wave.
quite incorrect.
chain of events (if you are from TR please add feedback ).
scenario - kunark launch -

1- TR ( was u getsome the leader ?), dominates server.his actual competitor is Dark ascension(was durison?).

2- tmo 1.0 is a smaller guild with few raid kills at this point leader is loly.

3- TMo+da fusion after a few joint raids(that massive wipe at gore in dl ice cave)

4- tmo starts challengin TR - and break TR dominance over Trak(back then it was both raids camped at trak spawn point for hours for a fte).

5- TR holds , but key momment happen.Durison , steals the guild shit. zeelot and new officers form up. few old da members move to TR .

6-TMo streak begins . agressive reforms , alot of people hitting 60 , the feud with TR, goes red hot with multiple TR key members found guilty of using 3 party softwares for raid scene . at this momment TMo holds a 17 kill streak over TR.(broken when jabroni trains his own guild , and left for TR).

7- TR start to be less seen in raid scene not competing for alot of mobs, rumour in the street is they focus in a private server for the incoming vp release .

8- vp opens and hell break loose

to be continued
  #178  
Old 07-05-2016, 05:13 PM
Arteker Arteker is offline
Fire Giant

Arteker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm in BDA on Phinny... and not a day goes by that TMO isn't mentioned in some form in guild chat. IN THEIR HEADS.
u were always a bda scum in your heart alartikus
  #179  
Old 07-05-2016, 05:35 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
quite incorrect.
chain of events (if you are from TR please add feedback ).
scenario - kunark launch -

1- TR ( was u getsome the leader ?), dominates server.his actual competitor is Dark ascension(was durison?).

2- tmo 1.0 is a smaller guild with few raid kills at this point leader is loly.

3- TMo+da fusion after a few joint raids(that massive wipe at gore in dl ice cave)

4- tmo starts challengin TR - and break TR dominance over Trak(back then it was both raids camped at trak spawn point for hours for a fte).

5- TR holds , but key momment happen.Durison , steals the guild shit. zeelot and new officers form up. few old da members move to TR .

6-TMo streak begins . agressive reforms , alot of people hitting 60 , the feud with TR, goes red hot with multiple TR key members found guilty of using 3 party softwares for raid scene . at this momment TMo holds a 17 kill streak over TR.(broken when jabroni trains his own guild , and left for TR).

7- TR start to be less seen in raid scene not competing for alot of mobs, rumour in the street is they focus in a private server for the incoming vp release .

8- vp opens and hell break loose

to be continued
I forgot about Jabroni, part of his app was to train Trak on us before he left for TR. Hilar! Think the Trak kill streak was 14 though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
u were always a bda scum in your heart alartikus
I was in BDA before Chest or TMO was even on the server. I left because in part TMO started and also because the guild was super cliquey and operated like a bunch of high school kiddies.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #180  
Old 07-05-2016, 06:00 PM
JurisDictum JurisDictum is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,791
Default

If Rustle and Aftermath joined it would be the most dominate guild on the server. Unfortunately, the leaders of Rustle like their loot council...how did that work out for everyone last time?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.